You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 149 No. 2, February 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Diagnosis Related Group 'All Payor' Hospital Payment and Medical Diseases

Financial Risk and Hospital Cost in Medical Noncomplicating Condition-Stratified Diagnosis Related Groups

Eric Muñoz, MD, MBA; Jonathan Goldstein, MPA; Teresa Benacquista, MD; Katherine Mulloy; Leslie Wise, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1989;149(2):417-420.


Abstract

• There are many health policy issues related to diagnosis-related group (DRG) hospital payment. Previous work by our group had suggested that some DRGs did not adequately compensate for patients with multiple complications and comorbidities. Despite recommendations by federal advisory committees, the secretary of Health and Human Services has proposed no major changes to DRGs along these lines. We analyze resource consumption in any of the 88 non—complicating condition (CC)—stratified medical DRGs using the DRG prospective "all payor system" in effect at our hospital. Analysis of 12340 medical patients by payor (Medicare, Medicaid, Blue Cross, and commercial insurance) in these non—CC-stratified medical DRGs for a three-year period demonstrated that patients with more CCs per DRG for each payor generated higher total hospital costs, a longer hospital length of stay, a greater percentage of procedures per patient, higher financial risk under DRG payment, and a higher mortality, compared with patients in these same DRGs with fewer CCs. These findings suggest that new prospective DRG all payor systems may be inequitable to certain groups of patients or types of hospitals vis-à-vis the non—CC-stratified medical DRGs. Health policy leaders should be encouraged to stratify many medical DRGs by the numbers and types of CCs to more equitably reimburse hospitals under DRG all payor systems.

(Arch Intern Med 1989;149:417-420)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, NY (Drs Muñoz, Wise, Benacquista, Mr Goldstein, and Ms Mulloy) and the State University of New York, Stonybrook (Drs Muñoz and Wise).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Aug 9, 1988.

Reprint requests to Research Division, Department of Surgery, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, NY 11042 (Dr Muñoz).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Exploring the impact of complications on length of stay in major surgery diagnosis-related groups
Librero et al.
Int J Qual Health Care 2004;16:51-57.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact of Methicillin Resistance on the Outcome of Patients With Bacteremia Caused by Staphylococcus aureus
Harbarth et al.
Arch Intern Med 1998;158:182-189.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Severity of Illness Indicators in an Intensive Care Unit
Gross et al.
Arch Intern Med 1991;151:2201-2205.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.