You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 149 No. 3, March 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (23)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Cost-effectiveness of the Sensitive Thyrotropin Assay in the Diagnosis of Thyroid Disease in Ambulatory Patients

Edith T. de los Santos, MD; Gale H. Starich, PhD; Ernest L. Mazzaferri, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1989;149(3):526-532.


Abstract



• The sensitivity and specificity of two sensitive thyrotropin assays were compared with those of other standard thyroid function tests in 544 ambulatory subjects who were clinically euthyroid, thyrotoxic, or hypothyroid. Both sensitive thyrotropin assays had the highest sensitivity and specificity (95%/89% and 92%/95%), followed by estimated free thyroxine (T4) level (82% and 94%), calculated free T4 index (78% and 93%), and free triiodothyronine index (86% and 88%). Sensitivity of the two thyrotropin assay kits in the diagnosis of thyrotoxicosis was 86% and 95%, and that in the diagnosis of hypothyroidism was 92% and 94%. Other tests were nearly as sensitive in the diagnosis of thyrotoxicosis but not hypothyroidism. A cost analysis of a testing strategy that used either total T4, free T4 index, or sensitive thyrotropin assay alone as the first-line thyroid test disclosed that to establish the patient's thyroid metabolic status would have cost $11 093, $14 536, and $24 902, respectively, using each test first. We suggest that, at current prices, routine use of the thyrotropin assay as a first-line test in ambulatory patients is not as cost-effective as the free T1 index.

(Arch Intern Med 1989;149:526-532)



Author Affiliations



From the Departments of Internal Medicine–Endocrinology and Metabolism (Dr de los Santos) and Internal Medicine and Physiology (Dr Mazzaferri), Ohio State University, Columbus; and Department of Medicine and Physiology, University of Nevada School of Medicine, Reno (Dr Starich).


Footnotes



Accepted for publication Sept 20, 1988.

Reprint requests to 215 Means Hall, 1654 Upham Dr, Columbus, OH 43210 (Dr Mazzaferri).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Alternative Sequences of Thyrotropin and Free Thyroxine Assays for Routine Thyroid Function Testing: Quality and Cost
Nordyke et al.
Arch Intern Med 1998;158:266-272.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Accelerated Bone Loss in Hypothyroid Patients Overtreated with L-Thyroxine
Stall et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1990;113:265-269.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.