You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 149 No. 3, March 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Correction
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (85)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

A Comparison of the Effect of Ipratropium and Albuterol in the Treatment of Chronic Obstructive Airway Disease

Sheldon R. Braun, MD; Wayland N. McKenzie, PhD; Cheryl Copeland, RN; Lester Knight, RCPT; Mark Ellersieck, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 1989;149(3):544-547.


Abstract



• Twenty-five subjects with moderate to severe chronic obstructive airway disease were studied to compare the effect of ipratropium bromide, albuterol, and placebo on the forced expiratory volume in 1 s, (FEV1), forced vital capacity, heart rate, and blood pressure during six hours. Ipratropium produced a significantly greater improvement than albuterol in the FEV1 at 30 minutes and at 3, 4, and 5 hours and in the forced vital capacity at one through six hours. Fifteen subjects did not demonstrate a 15% improvement and at least a 200-mL increase in the FEV1 15 minutes after metaproterenol sulfate aerosol. All 15 did improve after ipratropium therapy during the study. Ipratropium was effective significantly longer than albuterol. Subjects with better peak responses to ipratropium had a lower FEV1 percent predicted and a greater pack-year smoking history. In patients with chronic obstructive airway disease, ipratropium produces a longer duration of action than albuterol. It is more effective than albuterol in treating severely obstructed individuals and those not responding to metaproterenol. It is equally effective in treating others.

(Arch Intern Med 1989;149:544-547)



Author Affiliations



From the Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Environmental Medicine, University of Missouri School of Medicine (Drs Braun and McKenzie and Ms Copeland), the Department of Medicine, Harry S Truman Veterans Administration Hospital (Mr Knight), and the Agricultural Experimental Station (Dr Ellersieck), Columbia, Mo.


Footnotes



Accepted for publication Oct 26, 1988.

Reprint requests to Room MA419, Health Sciences Center, One Hospital Dr, Columbia, MO 65212 (Dr Braun).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Bronchodilator treatment of stable COPD: long-acting anticholinergics
Vincken
Eur Respir Rev 2005;14:23-31.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the clinical management of an acute exacerbation
Hurst and Wedzicha
Postgrad. Med. J. 2004;80:497-505.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Inhaled Formoterol Dry Powder Versus Ipratropium Bromide in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
DAHL et al.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2001;164:778-784.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effectiveness of salmeterol versus ipratropium bromide on exertional dyspnoea in COPD
Ayers et al.
Eur Respir J 2001;17:1132-1137.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation of COPD
Hilleman et al.
Chest 2000;118:1278-1285.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Effects of Oxitropium Bromide on Exercise Performance in Patients with Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease . A Comparison of Three Different Exercise Tests
OGA et al.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2000;161:1897-1901.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Apples and Oranges : Flaws and Guffaws
Petty et al.
Chest 1999;116:1137-1138.
FULL TEXT  

Clinical evidence: Stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Kerstjens
BMJ 1999;319:495-500.
FULL TEXT  

Effects of Inhaled Bronchodilators on Pulmonary Hemodynamics at Rest and During Exercise in Patients With COPD
Saito et al.
Chest 1999;115:376-382.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Building a National Strategy for the Prevention and Management of and Research in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Workshop Summary
Petty and Weinmann
JAMA 1997;277:246-253.
ABSTRACT  

The Pharmacological Treatment of Ambulatory Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients
DeYoung et al.
Journal of Pharmacy Practice 1992;5:204-216.
ABSTRACT  

Treatment of Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Rexing et al.
Journal of Pharmacy Practice 1992;5:217-223.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.