You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 149 No. 4, April 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (29)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

A Comparison of Employment Rates of Patients Treated With Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis vs In-Center Hemodialysis (Michigan End-Stage Renal Disease Study)

Mara Julius, ScD; Jill D. Kneisley, MS; Patricia Carpentier-Alting, MA; Victor M. Hawthorne, MD; Robert A. Wolfe, PhD; Friedrich K. Port, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1989;149(4):839-842.


Abstract

• This study examines factors associated with employment status in a stratified subsample of the Michigan End-Stage Renal Disease Study population. To reduce the variation in employment potential, the subsample consisted of nondiabetic patients aged 20 to 64 years. The patients were stratified on the basis of their treatment histories as follows: (1) treated by in-center hemodialysis only; (2) primarily treated by continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis; and (3) failed continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis, substituted by another form of dialysis. A significantly higher percentage of the patients undergoing stable continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis were in the labor force than were those undergoing in-center hemodialysis (27.4% vs 9.6%). Using logistic regression, even when adjusted for sex, race, age, education, marital status, primary diagnosis, and duration of end-stage renal disease, the stable continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis group was significantly more likely to be employed than the group undergoing either in-center hemodialysis only or the group that failed continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

(Arch Intern Med. 1989;149:839-842)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Epidemiology (Drs Julius and Hawthorne and Mss Kneisley and Carpentier-Alting), Biostatistics (Dr Wolfe), School of Public Health, and Department of Internal Medicine (Dr Port), School of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication November 14, 1988.

Reprint requests to University of Michigan, Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health I, 109 Observatory St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029 (Dr Julius).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Reimbursement and economic factors influencing dialysis modality choice around the world
Just et al.
Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008;23:2365-2373.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.