You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 149 No. 5, May 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  SPECIAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Advances in Management of Rheumatic Disease

1965 to 1985

James F. Fries, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1989;149(5):1002-1011.


Abstract

• Advances in management of the rheumatic diseases over the past 20 years have been substantial. Over this period, survival of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus improved dramatically. Previously fatal renal crisis in scleroderma became treatable. Survival in Wegener's granulomatosis improved from 7% after 2 years to over 90%. Gout became an easily and effectively managed disease. Polymyalgia rheumatica became readily recognized and dramatically treatable. Less quantifiably, the shift toward more aggressive use of an increasing repertoire of "disease-modifying" agents in rheumatoid arthritis gave hope of having altered the natural history of the disease. Replacement of destroyed joints dramatically reduced pain and improved function in appropriately selected individuals. An increasingly broad mission of the National Institutes of Health has provided support for systematic evaluation of clinical management, including the Multi-Purpose Arthritis Centers, the American Rheumatism Association Medical Information System, and the Cooperating Clinics, effectively complementing research in fundamental mechanisms of disease. The role of the concerned clinician and the clinical epidemiologist in identification of new syndromes and new diseases and in innovating approaches to their management has been extremely important; this role appears far from over.

(Arch Intern Med. 1989;149:1002-1011)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Medicine, Stanford (Calif) University School of Medicine.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication January 25, 1989.

Address reprint requests to Stanford University, HRP Bldg, Room 109C, Stanford, CA 94305 (Dr Fries).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Survival analysis of 306 European Spanish patients with systemic lupus erythematosus
Blanco et al.
Lupus 1998;7:159-163.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.