You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 149 No. 5, May 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (30)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Contributing Diagnoses in Osteoporosis

The Value of a Complete Medical Evaluation

Bruce E. Johnson, MD; Beth Lucasey, RN; Ralph G. Robinson, MD; Barbara P. Lukert, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1989;149(5):1069-1072.


Abstract



• Osteoporosis often occurs as a consequence of, or is accelerated by, many medical diseases, drug exposures, or other conditions. We called these conditions contributing diagnoses. Although technological advances permit the accurate measurement of bone density, identifying osteoporosis without searching for contributing diagnoses may result in remediable diseases being missed or in the initiation of inadvisable therapy. The value of comprehensive medical evaluation in conjunction with appropriate diagnostic studies was demonstrated in an osteoporosis referral center. We studied 300 consecutive persons who presented to an osteoporosis clinic. Using strict criteria, 180 patients (60%) had osteoporosis. Of these 180 patients, 83 (46%) had one or more contributing diagnosis, ie, a condition thought to accelerate bone loss. The largest single group was composed of persons with past or present exposure to glucocorticoids; the second largest group consisted of women who had undergone premature menopause. In all, 27 different contributing diagnoses were identified. Additionally, in 19(11%) of the 180 patients with osteoporosis, a contributing diagnosis new to those patients was made. The evaluation of osteoporosis does not only entail measurement of bone density but must also take into consideration a patient's entire medical milieu.

(Arch Intern Med. 1989;149:1069-1072)



Author Affiliations



From the Departments of Medicine (Drs Johnson and Lukert and Ms Lucasey) and Diagnostic Radiology (Nuclear Medicine) (Dr Robinson), University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City.


Footnotes



Accepted for publication December 28, 1988.

Reprint requests to Department of Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, 39th Street and Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS 66103 (Dr Johnson).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Contributors to Secondary Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Diseases in Patients Presenting with a Clinical Fracture
Bours et al.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011;96:1360-1367.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Search for secondary osteoporosis: are Z scores useful predictors?
Swaminathan et al.
Postgrad. Med. J. 2009;85:38-39.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Bones of Today, Bones of Tomor014
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1992;146:22-25.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.