You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 149 No. 7, July 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Nonemergent Cardiac Catheterization and Risk-Stratified Revascularization Following Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction

A Critical Analysis of Therapy in the Community Setting

William W. Rowe, MD; Ross J. Simpson, Jr, MD; David A. Tate, MD; Park W. Willis IV, MD; Timothy C. Nichols, MD; Jack W. Noneman, MD; Leonard S. Gettes, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1989;149(7):1611-1617.


Abstract

• We evaluated a strategy for administering thrombolytic therapy without emergent cardiac catheterization to patients with acute myocardial infarction in community hospitals. Fifty-nine patients were treated with intravenous streptokinase and heparin, and referred for elective catheterization. Angioplasty or bypass surgery was performed only in patients judged to be at risk for reinfarction. One or more predetermined criteria for infarct segment viability were present in 47(80%) of 59 patients. Angina recurred in 24 patients and enzyme-positive reinfarction in 9 patients, but only 2 patients developed new Q waves or a creatine kinase rise to over twice the normal value. Of 18 patients judged to be at low risk for reinfarction, only 1 required urgent angioplasty or bypass surgery. Fourteen-day mortality was 7% and infarct vessel patency was 94%. These data indicate that physicians in small community hospitals with a close relationship to a referral center and with a carefully designed protocol can administer thrombolytic therapy safely and effectively. By subsequent stratification of patients according to the risk of recurrent infarction, 22% of patients eligible for revascularization were spared urgent angioplasty or bypass surgery.

(Arch Intern Med. 1989;149:1611-1617)



Author Affiliations

the University of North Carolina Cardiology Consortium

From the Division of Cardiology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication March 4,1989.

Reprint requests to Division of Cardiology, Box 7075, Burnett-Womack Bldg, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 (Dr Gettes).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction
Beauchamp et al.
NEJM 1993;329:430-433.
FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Coronary Angiographic Features and Oral Dipyridamole Thallium 201 Tomography
Jain et al.
ANGIOLOGY 1991;42:99-105.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.