You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 149 No. 9, September 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (16)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Age, Resource Consumption, and Outcome for Medical Patients at an Academic Medical Center

Eric Muñoz, MD, MBA; Fred Rosner, MD; Don Chalfin, MD; Jonathan Goldstein, MPA; Irving Margolis, MD; Leslie Wise, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1989;149(9):1946-1950.


Abstract

• At the national level debate is growing about the effects of the diagnosis related group (DRG) hospital payment system on patient access and quality of care. Recent changes to the DRG system have dropped any stratification by age and have delayed any other major change to improve payment equity. We characterized hospital resource consumption and outcome by age for all medical admissions (N = 31 838) to a large academic medical center (January 1,1985, through December 31, 1987) using the DRG format. Mean hospital cost per patient, hospital length of stay, percentage of outliers, and mortality increased with age. The mean DRG case-mix index and the number of diagnostic codes per patient also rose with age. The DRG payment for all patients would have produced an aggregate profit of $34 426 951 ($1081 profit per patient); however, patients aged 71 years or older generated loses (the highest with patients aged 85 years or older—a $2177 loss per patient). As the financial position of American hospitals continues to deteriorate, these data suggest that the current DRG payment scheme may be inequitable for the medical patient aged 71 years or older, thus providing financial disincentives to treat the elderly medical patient and perhaps limiting their access and quality of care in the future.

(Arch Intern Med. 1989;149:1946-1950)



Author Affiliations

From the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, University Hospital, Newark (Dr Muñoz); the Departments of Medicine and Surgery, Queens Hospital Center, Jamaica, NY (Drs Rosner and Margolis); and the Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, NY (Drs Chalfin, Goldstein, and Wise).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication April 21, 1989.

Reprint requests to Medical Director, University Hospital, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, 150 Bergen St, Newark, NJ 07103-2425 (Dr Muñoz).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Intensive Care for Critically Ill Elderly: Mortality, Costs, and Quality of Life: Review of the Literature
Chelluri et al.
Arch Intern Med 1995;155:1013-1022.
ABSTRACT  

Do Older Medicare Patients Cost Hospitals More? Evidence From an Academic Medical Center
Rosenthal and Landefeld
Arch Intern Med 1993;153:89-96.
ABSTRACT  

Ethics and Economic Realities: Goals and Strategies for Care Toward the End of Life
WEBSTER and BERDES
Arch Intern Med 1990;150:1795-1797.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.