You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 149 No. 9, September 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Economic Effects of Prophylactic Use of Misoprostol to Prevent Gastric Ulcer in Patients Taking Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs

Alan L. Hillman, MD, MBA; Bernard S. Bloom, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 1989;149(9):2061-2065.


Abstract

• Prophylactic use of misoprostol has been found to cause a 15-fold reduction in the rate of gastric ulcer among symptomatic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug users with osteoarthritis. Using data from a variety of sources, we performed a decision analytic-based evaluation of direct medical costs in these patients to determine whether routine prophylactic use of this medication is a preferred strategy over no prophylaxis. The base-case analysis revealed that misoprostol is cost-reducing for the initial 3 months of prophylaxis when the compliance rate is 60%, the silent ulcer rate is 40%, and the medication is priced below $1.74/d (expected costs per patient of approximately $300). The model is highly sensitive to changes in these parameters. Changing the rates of hospitalization and operation have less effect. Reliable estimates of misoprostol's economic impact after the initial 3 months of treatment are impossible to develop with current data. Nonmedical direct costs, patients' out-of-pocket costs, and indirect economic effects, such as work loss, were not considered in the model. All would enhance the economic benefit of the medication. Health care policy makers and payers must consider trade-offs between the clinical and economic implications of preventive medical interventions, such as misoprostol, especially as the call intensifies for more efficient allocation of health care resources.

(Arch Intern Med. 1989;149:2061-2065)



Author Affiliations

From the Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, The Wharton School and the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication May 19, 1989.

Reprint requests to Box 624, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4283 (Dr Hillman).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Systematic review of the cost effectiveness of prophylactic treatments in the prevention of gastropathy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
van Dieten et al.
Ann Rheum Dis 2000;59:753-759.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: XIII. How to Use an Article on Economic Analysis of Clinical Practice A. Are the Results of the Study Valid?
Drummond et al.
JAMA 1997;277:1552-1557.
ABSTRACT  

Prevention of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug--Induced Gastrointestinal Mucosal Injury: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials
Koch et al.
Arch Intern Med 1996;156:2321-2332.
ABSTRACT  

NSAID Gastropathy: A New Understanding
Roth
Arch Intern Med 1996;156:1623-1628.
ABSTRACT  

Gastrointestinal Tract Complications of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug Treatment in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study
Singh et al.
Arch Intern Med 1996;156:1530-1536.
ABSTRACT  

Practical Management of Osteoarthritis: Integration of Pharmacologic and Nonpharmacologic Measures
Griffin et al.
Arch Fam Med 1995;4:1049-1055.
ABSTRACT  

Assessing the Economic Value of Pharmaceutical Products and Services
Xiaodong Kong and Stubbings
Journal of Pharmacy Practice 1995;8:143-155.
ABSTRACT  

Is Misoprostol Cost-effective in the Prevention of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug--Induced Gastropathy in Patients With Chronic Arthritis? A Review of Conflicting Economic Evaluations
Stucki et al.
Arch Intern Med 1994;154:2020-2025.
ABSTRACT  

Evaluating Drugs after Their Approval for Clinical Use
Ray et al.
NEJM 1993;329:2029-2032.
FULL TEXT  

Cost-Conscious Prescribing of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs for Adults With Arthritis: A Review and Suggestions
Greene and Winickoff
Arch Intern Med 1992;152:1995-2002.
ABSTRACT  

Effects of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs on Endogenous Gastrointestinal Prostaglandins and Therapeutic Strategies for Prevention and Treatment of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug--Induced Damage
Cryer and Feldman
Arch Intern Med 1992;152:1145-1155.
ABSTRACT  

The Cost-effectiveness of Misoprostol
Hillman and Bloom
JAMA 1991;265:593-593.
ABSTRACT  

Cost-effectiveness of Misoprostol for Prophylaxis Against Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug--Induced Gastrointestinal Tract Bleeding
Edelson et al.
JAMA 1990;264:41-47.
ABSTRACT  

How to Evaluate Drugs: Cost-effectiveness Analysis
Beck
JAMA 1990;264:83-84.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.