 |
 |

Improving the Utilization of Screening Mammography in Primary Care Practices
Ann Butler Nattinger, MD;
Robert J. Panzer, MD;
Joyce Janus, MD
Arch Intern Med. 1989;149(9):2087-2092.
Abstract
 |  |
Screening mammography is underutilized in many primary care practices. We designed a prospective, controlled trial to evaluate two strategies for improving the utilization of mammography in an academic general medicine clinic. We assigned teams of house officers to (1) physician audit with periodic feedback, (2) a visit-based strategy directed at both patient and physician, or (3) a no intervention concurrent control arm. After 6 months, the percentage of 50- to 74-year-old women meeting the standard of an annual mammogram was 36% for patients in the control arm, 62% for patients of feedback residents, and 54% for patients of the arm receiving the visit-based strategy. Patients of female providers were slightly more likely to meet the standard, but no effects were detected for patient race, new as opposed to follow-up patient, or higher frequency of clinic visits. We conclude that audit with feedback and a new visit-based strategy of a patient cue associated with a simplification of the ordering process each greatly improved the rate of utilization of screening mammography. Practitioners could reasonably choose the strategy most suited to their own situation.
(Arch Intern Med. 1989;149:2087-2092)
Author Affiliations
From the Departments of Medicine (Drs Nattinger and Panzer) and Radiology (Dr Janus), University of Rochester (NY) School of Medicine and Dentistry, and the Office of Clinical Practice Evaluation (Dr Panzer), Strong Memorial Hospital, Rochester, NY. Dr Nattinger is now with the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
Footnotes
Accepted for publication May 19, 1989.
Reprint requests to Medical College of Wisconsin, Division of General Internal Medicine, 8700 W Wisconsin Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53226 (Dr Nattinger).
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
Process evaluation on quality improvement interventions
Hulscher et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12:40-46.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Interventions That Increase Use of Adult Immunization and Cancer Screening Services: A Meta-Analysis
Stone et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2002;136:641-651.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Effectiveness of Interventions Designed to Increase Mammography Use: A Meta-Analysis of Provider-targeted Strategies
Mandelblatt and Yabroff
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 1999;8:759-767.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Patient Notification and Follow-up of Abnormal Test Results: A Physician Survey
Boohaker et al.
Arch Intern Med 1996;156:327-331.
ABSTRACT
Primary and Secondary Prevention Services in Clinical Practice: Twenty Years' Experience in Development, Implementation, and Evaluation
Thompson et al.
JAMA 1995;273:1130-1135.
ABSTRACT
Improving Compliance With Breast Cancer Screening in Older Women: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial
Herman et al.
Arch Intern Med 1995;155:717-722.
ABSTRACT
Computer-Assisted Preventive Care: Time to 'Byte' the Bullet?
McPhee
Arch Fam Med 1994;3:576-578.
ABSTRACT
The Impact of Physician Compliance on Screening Mammography for Older Women
Fox et al.
Arch Intern Med 1991;151:50-56.
ABSTRACT
|