You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 150 No. 10, October 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (15)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Vision Screening in a Primary Care Setting

A Missed Opportunity?

Ellen Strahlman, MD, MHS; Daniel Ford, MD, MPH; Paul Whelton, MD, MSc; Alfred Sommer, MD, MHS

Arch Intern Med. 1990;150(10):2159-2164.


Abstract

• To determine the effectiveness of vision screening in a primary care setting, we administered a questionnaire and a vision test to 458 patients from a general medical clinic. Subjects were referred for complete ophthalmologic evaluation if they failed the vision test or met other "high-risk" criteria based on information contained in the questionnaire. Patient-initiated requests for eye examinations were also honored. A total of 169 patients were scheduled for eye examinations, and 148 actually underwent ophthalmologic evaluation. One hundred one of those examined were referred on the basis of the study criteria. "Serious eye disease" (cataract, glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, or age-related macular degeneration) was diagnosed in 96 (95%) of these patients. Prompt surgical intervention was recommended in 27 (27%), and medical treatment was begun in 21 (21%). Of those with serious eye disease, 59% met the criteria by failing the vision test, while 69% met the high-risk criteria determined by the questionnaire. Of the 148 subjects who received ophthalmologic evaluations, 47 requested them. Serious eye disease was diagnosed in 23 (50%) of the 47 patients. None of these individuals required immediate surgery, and medical treatment for glaucoma was begun in eight (17%). These data suggest that screening for serious eye disease in a primary care setting is an efficient mechanism to use for the identification of patients with undetected ocular disorders that require follow-up or treatment.

(Arch Intern Med. 1990;150:2159-2164)



Author Affiliations

From the Dana Center for Preventive Ophthalmology, The Wilmer Ophthalmologic Institute (Drs Strahlman and Sommer), and the Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research (Drs Ford and Whelton), The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Md. Dr Strahlman is now with the Office of Biometry and Epidemiology, National Eye Institute, Bethesda, Md.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication April 30,1990.

Reprint requests to National Institutes of Health, Bldg 31, Room 6A10,9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Dr Strahlman).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Vision screening
Evans et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2009;93:704-705.
FULL TEXT  

Screening older people for impaired vision in primary care: cluster randomised trial
Smeeth et al.
BMJ 2003;327:1027.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Undetected Eye Disease in a Primary Care Clinic Population
Wang et al.
Arch Intern Med 1994;154:1821-1828.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.