You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 150 No. 11, November 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  REVIEW ARTICLES
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (35)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Empiric Treatment of Fungal Infections in the Neutropenic Host

Review of the Literature and Guidelines for Use

Alan M. Sugar, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1990;150(11):2258-2264.


Abstract



• Persistent fever that is refractory to broad-spectrum antibacterials is common in neutropenic patients undergoing induction chemotherapy of acute leukemia. Clinical experience suggests that many of these patients are infected with fungi. Until recently, data supporting the role of empiric antifungal therapy in this setting were limited to small groups of patients or postmortem reports. Evolving evidence in larger patient populations supports data from smaller series: febrile neutropenic patients who have failed to respond to a 4- to 7-day course of broad-spectrum antibacterials may benefit from the early initiation of antifungal therapy. Patients with fungal colonization or pulmonary infiltrates and adult patients who have not received previous fungal prophylaxis may especially benefit from the early use of antifungal drugs. Amphotericin B has been the "gold standard" for empiric antifungal therapy, although the newer azoles may be useful in certain situations.

(Arch Intern Med. 1990;150:2258-2264)



Author Affiliations



From the Evans Memorial Department of Clinical Research, The University Hospital, and Thorndike Memorial Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Boston (Mass) City Hospital.


Footnotes



Accepted for publication May 22,1990.

Reprint requests to The University Hospital, E-540, 88 E Newton St, Boston, MA 02118 (Dr Sugar).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Improving Efficacy of Antifungal Therapy by Polymerase Chain Reaction-Based Strategy among Febrile Patients with Neutropenia and Cancer
Lin et al.
Clinical Infectious Diseases 2001;33:1621-1627.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of empirical teicoplanin in febrile neutropenia with persistent fever after imipenem monotherapy
Erjavec et al.
J Antimicrob Chemother 2000;45:843-849.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Rashes in Immunocompromised Cancer Patients: The Diagnostic Yield of Skin Biopsy and Its Effects on Therapy
Chren et al.
Arch Dermatol 1993;129:175-181.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.