You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 150 No. 12, December 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Implementing Preventive Services

Success and Failure in an Outpatient Trial

Donald W. Belcher, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1990;150(12):2533-2541.


Abstract

• Physicians endorse prevention but provide only low levels of screening, health counseling, and immunization. Between 1981 and 1986, a randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Seattle (Wash) Veterans Affairs Medical Center to assess the effectiveness of the following three methods of delivery of preventive services: (1) a physician-oriented model that includes education and motivation, a chart flowsheet listing recommended activities, and periodic feedback about performance; (2) a patient education model in which patients were mailed an informative brochure advising them to ask physicians for preventive services as depicted in a patient-held pocket guide; and (3) a health promotion clinic that patients were invited to attend. A control group received their usual care. A total of 1224 male outpatients were enrolled in the trial. Baseline prevention rates for 12 age-specific prevention activities were below 25%. Neither the control group rates during the 5-year trial nor the rates for the two educational models, either singly or as a combined intervention, changed. Only the health promotion clinic model was effective, tripling prevention rates in its first year and sustaining these levels for all 5 years. It is difficult to change the clinic roles of experienced physicians and their long-term patients in a specialized multiclinic setting. Providing a separate health promotion clinic option is popular with patients, bypasses gatekeeper barriers, is reasonable in cost, and warrants wider application.

(Arch Intern Med. 1990;150:2533-2541)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, and Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Seattle.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication June 21, 1990.

Presented in part at the national meeting of the Society of General Internal Medicine, Washington, DC, June 4,1988.

Reprints not available.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Systematic Review: The Value of the Periodic Health Evaluation
Boulware et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2007;146:289-300.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Increase Cancer Screening Among Attendees of Community Health Centers
Roetzheim et al.
Ann Fam Med 2004;2:294-300.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Establishment of Blood Glucose Monitoring System Using the Internet
Kwon et al.
Diabetes Care 2004;27:478-483.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Variations in Diabetes Care and the Influence of Office Systems
Ellerbeck et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2004;19:12-18.
ABSTRACT  

The Effects of Promoting Patient Access to Medical Records: A Review
Ross and Lin
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2003;10:129-138.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

References
Circulation 2002;106:3373-3421.
FULL TEXT  

Task Force #4--adherence issues and behavior changes: achieving a long-term solution
Ockene et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:630-640.
FULL TEXT  

Promoting influenza vaccination of elderly patients in primary care
Humair et al.
Fam Pract 2002;19:383-389.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Interventions That Increase Use of Adult Immunization and Cancer Screening Services: A Meta-Analysis
Stone et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2002;136:641-651.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Dissemination of Diabetes Care Guidelines: Lessons Learned From Community Health Centers
Walker et al.
The Diabetes Educator 2001;27:101-110.
ABSTRACT  

Videotape-Based Decision Aid for Colon Cancer Screening: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Pignone et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2000;133:761-769.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Use of a Low-Literacy Patient Education Tool to Enhance Pneumococcal Vaccination Rates: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Jacobson et al.
JAMA 1999;282:646-650.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Multilevel Compliance Challenge: Recommendations for a Call to Action: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals
Miller et al.
Circulation 1997;95:1085-1090.
FULL TEXT  

Delivery of Vaccines to Adults: Correlations with Physician Knowledge and Patient Variables
Hershey and Karuza
American Journal of Medical Quality 1997;12:143-150.
ABSTRACT  

Assessment of Delivery of Preventive Health Services
Hershey et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 1996;11:81-86.
ABSTRACT  

Use of a 'Health Habits Questionnaire' to Improve Health Promotion Counseling
Madlon-Kay et al.
Arch Fam Med 1995;4:459-462.
ABSTRACT  

Primary and Secondary Prevention Services in Clinical Practice: Twenty Years' Experience in Development, Implementation, and Evaluation
Thompson et al.
JAMA 1995;273:1130-1135.
ABSTRACT  

Improving Compliance With Breast Cancer Screening in Older Women: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial
Herman et al.
Arch Intern Med 1995;155:717-722.
ABSTRACT  

Patient-Perceived Barriers to Preventive Health Care Among Indigent, Rural Appalachian Patients
Elnicki et al.
Arch Intern Med 1995;155:421-424.
ABSTRACT  

Health Promotion and Nurses
baggs
Arch Intern Med 1991;151:2484-2484.
ABSTRACT  

Health Promotion and Nurses-Reply
Belcher
Arch Intern Med 1991;151:2484-2485.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.