You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 150 No. 2, February 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (35)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Effect of Oral and Parenteral Typhoid Vaccination on the Rate of Infection With Salmonella typhi and Salmonella paratyphi A Among Foreigners in Nepal

Eli Schwartz, MD; David R. Shlim, MD; Molly Eaton, MD; Nancy Jenks, FNP; Robin Houston, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1990;150(2):349-351.


Abstract

• We studied the incidence of enteric fever among travelers and foreign residents who attended an expatriate clinic in Kathmandu, Nepal, from February 1987 to June 1988. There were 42 cases of enteric fever; 20 were caused by Salmonella typhi and 22 by Salmonella paratyphi A. Among 18 unvaccinated foreigners who had enteric fever, S typhi was isolated from 67%, and S paratyphi A from 33%, a ratio similar to the local Nepalese population. Among 22 vaccinated foreigners, S typhi was isolated from 35%, compared with 65% with S paratyphi A. Nine percent of tourists had received the oral Ty21 A typhoid vaccine. However, among seven vaccinated tourists who became infected with S typhi, four (57%) had received the oral vaccine. Typhoid vaccine efficacy for tourists was calculated and showed an overall protective rate of 90% against enteric fever in general, 95% protection against S typhi, and 72% to 75% protection against S paratyphi A. We conclude that typhoid vaccine should be recommended to all travelers to the Indian subcontinent, and since S paratyphi A is the predominant cause of enteric fever among vaccinated travelers, consideration should be given to an effective vaccine against S paratyphi A when that becomes available.

(Arch Intern Med. 1990;150:349-351)



Author Affiliations

From the Canadian International Water and Energy Consultants Clinic (Drs Schwartz, Shlim, and Eaton, and Ms Jenks); and the American Peace Corps Medical Unit (Dr Houston), Kathmandu, Nepal.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication August 8,1989.

Reprint requests to the Canadian International Water and Energy Consultants Clinic, PO Box 1340, Kathmandu, Nepal (Dr Shlim).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

FEAR OF INJECTIONS IN YOUNG ADULTS: PREVALENCE AND ASSOCIATIONS
NIR et al.
Am J Trop Med Hyg 2003;68:341-344.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A New Typhoid Vaccine Composed of the Vi Capsular Polysaccharide
Plotkin and Cam
Arch Intern Med 1995;155:2293-2299.
ABSTRACT  

Compliance With Live, Oral Ty21a Typhoid Vaccine
Kaplan and Hill
JAMA 1992;267:1074-1074.
ABSTRACT  

Oral Typhoid Vaccination for Travelers
Woodruff and Chen
Arch Intern Med 1991;151:619-620.
ABSTRACT  

A New Look at Typhoid Vaccination: Information for the Practicing Physician
Woodruff et al.
JAMA 1991;265:756-759.
ABSTRACT  

The Effect of Oral and Parenteral Typhoid Vaccination
KOZARSKY and KEYSTONE
Arch Intern Med 1990;150:2422-2422.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.