This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (35)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Comparison of House Staff and Attending Physician Attitudes and Practices

Judith S. Black, MD; Terri Sefcik, MS; Wishwa Kapoor, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1990;150(2):389-393.

Abstract
• The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare attending physician and house staff attitudes and practices regarding health promotion and disease prevention in the elderly. Seventy-four physicians (38 house staff and 36 attending physicians) were surveyed from four sites in Pittsburgh, Pa, regarding their agreement with recommendations of the American Cancer Society and the Canadian Task Force. Two hundred fifty patients were interviewed and their charts were reviewed for performance of the recommendations. In all patients, physicians agreed highly with the American Cancer Society and the Canadian Task Force recommendations (agreement, 80% to 100%), with the exception of proctoscopy and thyroid examinations. Physicians performed screening procedures much less frequently. House staff and attending physicians differed regarding their attitudes about prevention. House staff felt the need for more formal instruction and were more positive regarding a healthy life-style and commitment to health promotion. The significant predictors of tests (defined as either examination or test ordered by a physician) were presence of a checklist, site of practice, and physician status. A logistic regression analysis was performed; however, this model could not entirely explain the variations found. Although physicians agreed with recommendations for screening, the attending physicians and house staff (particularly attending physicians) were less likely to perform the screening, especially in the elderly.

(Arch Intern Med. 1990;150:389-393)

Author Affiliations
From the Department of Medicine, Sections of Geriatrics and Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh (Pa).

Footnotes
Accepted for publication October 4,1989.

Presented at the Midwest Regional Meeting of the American Federation for Clinical Research, Chicago, Ill, November 11,1988.

Reprint requests to Saint Margaret Memorial Hospital, 815 Freeport Rd, Pittsburgh, PA 15215 (Dr Black).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Why Don't Physicians Follow Clinical Practice Guidelines?: A Framework for Improvement
Cabana et al.
JAMA 1999;282:1458-1465.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improving Preventive Health Care in a Medical Resident Practice
Cardozo et al.
Arch Intern Med 1998;158:261-264.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

As Mammography Use Increases, Are Some Providers Omitting Clinical Breast Examination?
Burns et al.
Arch Intern Med 1996;156:741-744.
ABSTRACT  

Improving Compliance With Breast Cancer Screening in Older Women: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial
Herman et al.
Arch Intern Med 1995;155:717-722.
ABSTRACT  

Permanent Pacemaker Selection and Subsequent Survival in Elderly Medicare Pacemaker Recipients
Lamas et al.
Circulation 1995;91:1063-1069.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Barriers to Following National Cholesterol Educational Program Guidelines: An Appraisal of Poor Physician Compliance
Fix and Oberman
Arch Intern Med 1992;152:2385-2387.
ABSTRACT  

Efforts to Improve Compliance With the National Cholesterol Education Program Guidelines: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial
Headrick et al.
Arch Intern Med 1992;152:2490-2496.
ABSTRACT