You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 150 No. 2, February 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (26)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Early Detection and Control of Cancer in Clinical Practice

Marilyn Bergner, PhD; Charlene J. Allison, PhD; Paula Diehr, PhD; Leslie G. Ford, MD; Polly Feigl, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 1990;150(2):431-436.


Abstract

• As part of the Community Cancer Care Evaluation, a randomsample survey of practicing physicians in 12 geographic areas was conducted in 1985 to provide information about physician practice patterns with reference to cancer detection, control, and treatment. All respondents were asked whether they routinely performed comprehensive physical examinations, breast palpations, mammography, rectal examinations, chest roentgenography, and stool guaiac examinations on normal healthy patients older than 50 years. Responses were examined in terms of American Cancer Society and National Cancer Institute (Bethesda, Md) recommendations. Conformity with recommendations was dependent on the geographic area, the specific procedure, and the specialty of the physician. Across all procedures, frequency of performance varied with years since graduation from medical school, with more recent graduates more likely to conform to recommended standards.

(Arch Intern Med. 1990;150:431-436)



Author Affiliations

From The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, Md (Dr Bergner); Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Wash (Dr Allison); Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle (Drs Diehr and Feigl); and Community Oncology and Rehabilitation Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Md (Dr Ford).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication September 1,1989.

Reprint requests to The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health, Health Services Research and Development Center, 624 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205 (Dr Bergner).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Cancer Prevention Services and Physician Consensus in Primary Care Group Practices
Love et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2004;13:958-966.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Do Physicians Do as They Say? The Case of Mammography
Saver et al.
Arch Fam Med 1997;6:543-548.
ABSTRACT  

Frequency and Determinants of Screening for Breast Cancer in Primary Care Group Practice
Love et al.
Arch Intern Med 1993;153:2113-2117.
ABSTRACT  

Screening Mammography in Clinical Practice: A Complex Activity
Love and Davis
Arch Intern Med 1991;151:19-21.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.