You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 150 No. 3, March 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (16)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Impact of Thoracic Computed Tomography in Clinically Staged T1, NO, MO Chest Lesions

CPT Gregory L. Becker, MC; MAJ Warren L. Whitlock, MC; MAJ Paul S. Schaefer, MC; COL Michael F. Tenholder, MC

Arch Intern Med. 1990;150(3):557-559.


Abstract

• We assessed the impact of thoracic computed tomography (CT) in 38 patients considered for thoracotomy for solitary pulmonary lesions characterized as T1, NO, MO by clinical and roentgenographic staging. False-positive lymph nodes were identified by CT in four patients prompting additional surgical staging procedures in two cases. Two of three patients with false-negative clinical, roentgenographic, and CT findings had successful complete resections. The CT scan did not correctly advance the stage of, or alter the plan for, these lesions in any patient. We conclude that CT is not helpful in patients considered for diagnostic and therapeutic thoracotomy for clinical and roentgenographic T1, NO, MO lesions.

(Arch Intern Med. 1990;150:557-559)



Author Affiliations

USA; USA; USA; USA

From the Pulmonary Disease Service (Drs Becker, Whitlock, and Tenholder) and Department of Radiology (Dr Schaefer), Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication December 7,1989.

The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as a reflection of the views of the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense.

Reprint requests to the Pulmonary Disease Service, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC 20307-5001 (Dr Becker).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Evaluation of Patients With Pulmonary Nodules: When Is It Lung Cancer?: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (2nd Edition)
Gould et al.
Chest 2007;132:108S-130S.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cost-Effectiveness of Alternative Management Strategies for Patients with Solitary Pulmonary Nodules
Gould et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2003;138:724-735.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Solitary Pulmonary Nodule
Tan et al.
Chest 2003;123 :89S-96S.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Computed tomography in staging for lung cancer
Verschakelen et al.
Eur Respir J 2002;19:40S-48s.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Accuracy of Positron Emission Tomography for Diagnosis of Pulmonary Nodules and Mass Lesions: A Meta-analysis
Gould et al.
JAMA 2001;285:914-924.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Distribution of Distant Metastases From Newly Diagnosed Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Quint et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1996;62:246-250.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.