You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 150 No. 4, April 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  REVIEW ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (19)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Colon Cancer Screening

The Dilemma of Positive Screening Tests

David A. Lieberman, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1990;150(4):740-744.


Abstract

• Despite doubts about the benefits of colon cancer screening, sigmoidoscopy and fecal occult blood tests are now often performed by clinicians who must then deal with positive test results. The purpose of this literature review is to examine potential strategies for dealing with positive screening test results. If positive results are obtained, current data support the use of colonoscopy as the single most effective diagnostic strategy. Exceptions include situations that reduce the predictive value of the screening test. Several important areas of controversy are highlighted that need to be assessed in subsequent studies.

(Arch Intern Med. 1990;150:740-744)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, and the Portland (Ore) Veterans Administration Medical Center.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication October 4,1989.

Reprint requests to Portland Veterans Administration Medical Center, PO Box 1034, Portland, OR 97207 (Dr Lieberman).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Findings and Impact of Nonrehydrated Guaiac Examination of the Rectum (FINGER) Study: A Comparison of 2 Methods of Screening for Colorectal Cancer in Asymptomatic Average-Risk Patients
Bini et al.
Arch Intern Med 1999;159:2022-2026.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Relative Frequency of Upper Gastrointestinal and Colonic Lesions in Patients with Positive Fecal Occult-Blood Tests
Rockey et al.
NEJM 1998;339:153-159.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Fecal Occult Blood Screening for Colorectal Cancer
Van Dam et al.
Arch Intern Med 1995;155:2389-2402.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.