You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 150 No. 4, April 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (91)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Serologic Tests for Lyme Disease

Interlaboratory Variability

Steven W. Luger, MD; Elliot Krauss, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1990;150(4):761-763.


Abstract

• The serologic test for the detection of antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi is the most frequently used laboratory method for the diagnosis of Lyme disease. However, the insensitivity of the assays and the interlaboratory variability are frequent problems. To determine the extent of this variability, one aliquot of serum from each of nine patients with a history of Lyme disease was sent to nine reference laboratories, including national, university, state, and local hospital laboratories. A second aliquot of the original serum was submitted 2 weeks later. Wide variability among laboratories was observed, ranging from a university laboratory that detected antibody to B burgdorferi (IgG or IgM) in 18 of 18 specimens, to a state laboratory that detected antibody in only 8 of 18 specimens. Detection of IgM specific antibodies showed similar variability (range, 2 to 10 of 18). There were eight instances of a fourfold or greater change in titer between the aliquots sent 2 weeks apart, although only three of these were an increase in titer. These results indicate the need for standardization of the assays and the availability of national reference material. It is recommended that the results of serologic testing should not be relied on as the sole criteria in making the diagnosis of Lyme disease.

(Arch Intern Med. 1990;150:761-763)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Pathology, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey–Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ (Dr Krauss). Dr Luger is in private practice, Old Lyme, Conn. Dr Krauss is now with the Medical Center at Princeton (NJ).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication October 31,1989.

Reprint requests to the Department of Pathology, Princeton Medical Center, Princeton, NJ 08540 (Dr Krauss).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Novel Diagnosis of Lyme Disease: Potential for CAM Intervention
Vojdani et al.
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2009;6:283-295.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Use of Serum Immune Complexes in a New Test That Accurately Confirms Early Lyme Disease and Active Infection with Borrelia burgdorferi
Brunner and Sigal
J. Clin. Microbiol. 2001;39:3213-3221.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Role of Serology in the Diagnosis of Lyme Disease
Brown et al.
JAMA 1999;282:62-66.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Truth About Erythema Migrans
Feder et al.
Arch Dermatol 1997;133:93-94.
ABSTRACT  

Pitfalls in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Lyme Disease in Children
Feder and Hunt
JAMA 1995;274:66-68.
ABSTRACT  

False positive seroreactivity to Borrelia burgdorferi in systemic lupus erythematosus: the value of immunoblot analysis
Weiss et al.
Lupus 1995;4:131-137.
ABSTRACT  

Detection of Borreliacidal Antibodies by Flow Cytometry: An Accurate, Highly Specific Serodiagnostic Test for Lyme Disease
Callister et al.
Arch Intern Med 1994;154:1625-1632.
ABSTRACT  

Physician Beliefs, Attitudes, and Approaches Toward Lyme Disease in an Endemic Area
Eppes et al.
CLIN PEDIATR 1994;33:130-134.
ABSTRACT  

The Overdiagnosis of Lyme Disease
Cleveland
JAMA 1993;270:2682-2683.
ABSTRACT  

The biological and social phenomenon of Lyme disease
Barbour and Fish
Science 1993;260:1610-1616.
ABSTRACT  

Performance of 45 Laboratories Participating in a Proficiency Testing Program for Lyme Disease Serology
Bakken et al.
JAMA 1992;268:891-895.
ABSTRACT  

Current Perspective on Lyme Borreliosis
Kaslow
JAMA 1992;267:1381-1383.
ABSTRACT  

Lyme Disease: Tracking an Epidemic
Dennis
JAMA 1991;266:1269-1270.
ABSTRACT  

Problems in the Use of Serologic Tests for the Diagnosis of Lyme Disease
Corpuz et al.
Arch Intern Med 1991;151:1837-1840.
ABSTRACT  

Lyme Anxiety
Caputo
JAMA 1991;266:359-359.
ABSTRACT  

The Laboratory Diagnosis of Lyme Disease
Berg et al.
Arch Dermatol 1991;127:866-870.
ABSTRACT  

Lyme Test Problems-Reply
Luger
Arch Intern Med 1991;151:816-816.
ABSTRACT  

Lyme Test Problems
Cameron
Arch Intern Med 1991;151:815-816.
ABSTRACT  

Lyme Disease: Recommendations for Diagnosis and Treatment
Rahn and Malawista
ANN INTERN MED 1991;114:472-481.
ABSTRACT  

Positive Lyme Serology in Subacute Bacterial Endocarditis: A Study of Four Patients
Kaell et al.
JAMA 1990;264:2916-2918.
ABSTRACT  

Serologic Tests for Antibody to Borrelia burgdorferi Another Pandora's Box for Medicine?
HEDBERG and OSTERHOLM
Arch Intern Med 1990;150:732-733.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.