This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (59)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Still Too Little Too Late

Kevin Gleeson, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1990;150(5):1057-1060.

Abstract
• We reviewed the records of 274 consecutive deaths at the Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pa, occurring through May 1988 to examine the approach of physicians, patients, and families in making the decision to invoke the "do-not-resuscitate" order. Of these 274 patients who died, 171 (62%) had do-not-resuscitate orders. Of these 171 patients, 86 (50%) were judged fully mentally competent on admission to the hospital; 44 (51%) of these 86 fully competent patients were included in the decision to withhold resuscitative efforts. In the remainder, the family was usually involved in the decision without input from the patient. Only 6 patients (4%) were admitted to the hospital with a preexisting do-not-resuscitate order. For the remainder, the do-not-resuscitate order was written a mean of 8.5 days following admission and 3.3 days before death. Documentation of this order with a specific progress note was universal. The principle reason cited for a do-not-resuscitate order was the presence of irreversible terminal disease in 52% and an unacceptable quality of life in 33%. When considered separately, patients with a principle diagnosis of malignant neoplasm had a do-not-resuscitate order written 80% of the time. Of 88 such patients, 48 (55%) were fully competent at admission. In turn, 36 (75%) of these patients participated in the do-not-resuscitate decision. Nursing activities were quantified for the 24 hours preceding and the 24 hours following the do-not-resuscitate order. No difference could be found comparing these two periods whether the comparison was made on the general hospital ward or in the intensive care unit. We conclude that some progress is being made as a reasonable percentage of mentally competent patients dying in this center are included in the decision to limit their care at the time of death. However, this decision is only rarely considered until late in the course of most patients' terminal hospitalization. A do-not-resuscitate order apparently does not result in a reduction in the quantity of nursing activity for patients as they die.

(Arch Intern Med. 1990;150:1057-1060)

Author Affiliations
Scott Wise

From the Department of Medicine, Pulmonary/Critical Care Division, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey.

Footnotes
Accepted for publication December 13,1989.

Reprints not available.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The do-not-resuscitate order: associations with advance directives, physician specialty and documentation of discussion 15 years after the Patient Self-Determination Act
Morrell et al.
J. Med. Ethics 2008;34:642-647.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Patients With Cancer
Varon and Marik
AM J HOSP PALLIAT CARE 2007;24:224-229.
ABSTRACT  

Advance Care Planning in a Frail Older Population: Patient Versus Program Influences
Temkin-Greener et al.
Research on Aging 2005;27:659-691.
ABSTRACT  

Improving the ICU: Part 1
Garland
Chest 2005;127:2151-2164.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evaluation of end of life care in cancer patients at a teaching hospital in Japan
Tokuda et al.
J. Med. Ethics 2004;30:264-267.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Increasing use of DNR orders in the elderly worldwide: whose choice is it?
Cherniack
J. Med. Ethics 2002;28:303-307.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical Factors That Influence Patients' Desire for Participation in Decisions About Illness
Mansell et al.
Arch Intern Med 2000;160:2991-2996.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Family Members' Experiences With Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR)
LARSEN
Journal of Family Issues 1999;20:269-289.
ABSTRACT  

Advance End-of-Life Treatment Planning
Miles et al.
Arch Intern Med 1996;156:1062-1068.
ABSTRACT  

Epidemiology of Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders: Disparity by Age, Diagnosis, Gender, Race, and Functional Impairment
Wenger et al.
Arch Intern Med 1995;155:2056-2062.
ABSTRACT  

Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders at a Teaching Hospital in Japan
Fukaura et al.
NEJM 1995;333:805-808.
FULL TEXT  

Terminal Care of the Very Old: Changes in the Way We Die
Hesse
Arch Intern Med 1995;155:1513-1518.
ABSTRACT  

New Do-Not-Resuscitate Policies
Small
Arch Intern Med 1994;154:1536-1539.
ABSTRACT  

The Economics of Dying -- The Illusion of Cost Savings at the End of Life
Emanuel and Emanuel
NEJM 1994;330:540-544.
FULL TEXT  

Prevalence of Advance Directives and Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders in Community Nursing Facilities
Terry and Zweig
Arch Fam Med 1994;3:141-145.
ABSTRACT  

Myth of Substituted Judgment: Surrogate Decision Making Regarding Life Support Is Unreliable
Suhl et al.
Arch Intern Med 1994;154:90-96.
ABSTRACT  

Do Not Resuscitate Orders and the Cost of Death
Maksoud et al.
Arch Intern Med 1993;153:1249-1253.
ABSTRACT  

Impact of a Procedure-Specific Do Not Resuscitate Order Form on Documentation of Do Not Resuscitate Orders
Mittelberger et al.
Arch Intern Med 1993;153:228-232.
ABSTRACT  

Life-Sustaining Interventions in Frail Elderly Persons: Talking About Choices
Kellogg et al.
Arch Intern Med 1992;152:2317-2320.
ABSTRACT  

Factors Associated With Veterans' Decisions About Living Wills
Sugarman et al.
Arch Intern Med 1992;152:343-347.
ABSTRACT  

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Teaching Hospitals
Green
ANN INTERN MED 1991;115:578-578.
ABSTRACT  

Advance Directives on Admission Clinical Implications and Analysis of the Patient Self-Determination Act of 1990
La Puma et al.
JAMA 1991;266:402-405.
ABSTRACT  

Discussing Life-Sustaining Treatment: A Teaching Program for Residents
Gordon and Tolle
Arch Intern Med 1991;151:567-570.
ABSTRACT