You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 150 No. 5, May 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

A Public Health Model for Cardiovascular Risk Reduction

Impact of Cholesterol Screening With Brief Nonphysician Counseling

Donald H. Gemson, MD, MPH; Richard P. Sloan, PhD; Peter Messeri, PhD; Ira J. Goldberg, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1990;150(5):985-989.


Abstract

• To examine the impact of cholesterol screening with brief nonphysician counseling on cardiovascular risk factors, 886 employees at a large financial services firm underwent finger-stick screening followed by brief (3- to 5- minute) counseling by a registered nurse. At the 6-month follow-up, there were significant declines in total cholesterol levels (5.9 to 5.5 mmol/L [228 to 213 mg/dL]), weight (78 to 75 kg), blood pressure (119/78 to 115/75 mm Hg), and number of people reporting smoking (16.8% to 14.5%) among participants with a baseline cholesterol value of 5.2 mmol/L (200 mg/dL) or greater. A randomized experiment was conducted on 137 participants initially classified as having a "borderline—high blood cholesterol" level (5.2 to 6.2 mmol/L [200 to 239 mg/dL]) to test the impact of frequency of follow-up. Those receiving frequent follow-up (cholesterol measurement and brief counseling at 2, 4, and 6 months) reported significantly greater dietary change and demonstrated a trend toward greater declines in total cholesterol compared with those receiving follow-up at 6 months only. The results of this study support the feasibility and efficacy of cholesterol screening utilizing brief nonphysician counseling on multiple cardiovascular risk factors and suggest an enhanced effect when patients receive more frequent follow-up.

(Arch Intern Med. 1990;150:985-989)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University School of Public Health (Drs Gemson and Messeri), the Behavioral Medicine Program (Dr Sloan), and the Department of Medicine, College of Physicians and Surgeons (Dr Goldberg), Columbia University, New York, NY.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication January 19,1990.

Reprint requests to Division of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University School of Public Health, 600 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (Dr Gemson).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Discrepancies in findings from effectiveness reviews: the case of health promotion interventions to change cholesterol levels
Peersman et al.
Health Education Journal 1999;58:192-202.
ABSTRACT  

Reducing Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels in an Ambulatory Care System: Results of a Multidisciplinary Collaborative Practice Lipid Clinic Compared With Traditional Physician-Based Care
Shaffer and Wexler
Arch Intern Med 1995;155:2330-2335.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.