You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 150 No. 6, June 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (10)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

A Randomized Double-blind Clinical Trial of a Mammalian Cell-Derived Recombinant DNA Hepatitis B Vaccine Compared With a Plasma-Derived Vaccine

Mabel L. Halliday, MD, MSc; James G. Rankin, MB,BS, FRCPC; Nancy J. Bristow; Randall A. Coates, MD, FRCPC; Paul N. J. Corey, PhD; Albert C. Strickler, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1990;150(6):1195-1200.


Abstract

• Eight hundred volunteers from health care and emergency fields participated in a randomized double-blind clinical trial of a new experimental mammalian cell—derived recombinant DNA hepatitis B vaccine (Betagen) compared with a licensed plasmaderived vaccine (Heptavax-B). Vaccine injections (20 µg) were administered intramuscularly at 0, 1, and 6 months, and sera were tested at 0,1, 2, 3,6, 7, and 12 months for hepatitis B surface antigen, antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen, and antibody to hepatitis B core antigen. Data from 745 vaccinees (93.1%), analyzed at the 7th month of follow-up, showed no significant difference in the seroconversion rates for Betagen (94.4%) vs Heptavax-B (97.3%), but the geometric mean titer of antibody was significantly higher for Heptavax-B (11 833 mlU/L) than for Betagen (4628 mlU/mL). The antibody response of Betagen was significantly and independently related to age and sex, while that of Heptavax-B was related to age only. Reported side effects from both vaccines were minor and mild, with approximately one fourth of all vaccinees reporting at least one side effect. Vaccinees, who had a protective level of antibody at the 7th month, were tested for antibodies at the 12th month. Of those in the Betagenvaccinated group and those in the Heptavax-B-vaccinated group, 99.0% and 100%, respectively, were still protected. There was a proportionately larger decline in the geometric mean titers of antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen for Heptavax-B than for Betagen.

(Arch Intern Med. 1990;150:1195-1200)



Author Affiliations

From the Canadian Liver Foundation Epidemiology Unit, Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto (Canada) (Drs Halliday, Rankin, Coates, and Corey and Ms Bristow), and the Department of Occupational Health, Toronto (Canada) General Hospital (Dr Strickler).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication December 4,1989.

Reprint requests to Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 12 Queen's Park Crescent W, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S1A8 (Dr Halliday).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.