You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 150 No. 7, July 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (24)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Triage Considerations in Medical Intensive Care

Cory Franklin, MD; Eric C. Rackow, MD; Bashir Mamdani, MD; Gerald Burke, MD; Max Harry Weil, MD, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 1990;150(7):1455-1459.


Abstract

• As an initial step toward improving admission criteria to the medical intensive care unit (MICU), we examined Acute Physiologic and Chronic Health Evaluation scores and the diagnosisadjusted mortality rates of 2419 medical patients, including those who received MICU consultation over a 6-month period. There was considerable overlap in the physiologic scores and the predicted mortality rates between those patients who were admitted to the MICU and those who were not. There was no discrete score or mortality rate at which triage to the MICU would have included most MICU patients but excluded most patients who survived without admission to the MICU. While uniform MICU admission criteria would be desirable, current scoring systems may not have the desired sensitivity or specificity to establish such criteria. Using a receiver operating characteristic curve, we demonstrated that diagnosis-adjusted mortality rates could predict as well as Acute Physiologic and Chronic Health Evaluation scores which patients would receive MICU admission and intervention. This suggests that, for different diagnoses, specific clinical variables and laboratory tests may have different predictive importance for MICU admission. Prospective models of clinical variables using receiver operating characteristic curves in various medical diseases may improve triage procedures.

(Arch Intern Med. 1990;150:1455-1459)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cook County Hospital, Chicago, Ill (Drs Franklin, Mamdani, and Burke) and University of Health Sciences/The Chicago Medical School, North Chicago, Ill (Drs Rackow and Weil).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication February 7,1990.

Reprint requests to Department of Medicine, University of Health Sciences/The Chicago Medical School, 3333 Green Bay Rd, North Chicago, IL 60064 (Dr Weil).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Prognosis and outcome of 26 patients with systemic necrotizing vasculitis admitted to the intensive care unit
Cruz et al.
Rheumatology (Oxford) 2003;42:1183-1188.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Patients Readmitted to ICUs* : A Systematic Review of Risk Factors and Outcomes
Rosenberg and Watts
Chest 2000;118:492-502.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Fair Allocation of Intensive Care Unit Resources
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1997;156:1282-1301.
FULL TEXT  

APACHE scoring and prediction of survival in intensive care
Pilkington
BMJ 1995;310:1197b-1197.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.