You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 150 No. 8, August 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Review Articles
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Antipyresis and Fever

Barbara Styrt; Barrett Sugarman

Arch Intern Med. 1990;150(8):1589-1597.


Abstract

While understanding of the mechanisms of fever has progressed in recent years, much uncertainty remains as to whether fever in itself (as distinct from its cause) is beneficial or harmful, and what circumstances warrant antipyretic therapy. This review was designed to identify studies providing information on the effects of fever and of pharmacologic and physical therapy. Fever or analogous behavioral thermal upregulation apparently has positive effects on defense against infection in some animal models. Retrospective studies in humans suggest that failure to mount a febrile response is associated with poor outcome in certain infections but do not establish a causal relationship. Induction of fever apparently had therapeutic value in infections such as syphilis before specific antimicrobials were developed. Fever may have deleterious effects in the context of borderline cardiovascular or neurologic function or pregnancy, but data in most instances cannot separate effects of fever per se from that of underlying disease. Antipyretic drugs are effective in diminishing fever, but they have significant side effects and may suppress signs of ongoing infection. Physical cooling is important when physiologic thermoregulatory mechanisms are overwhelmed, but may sometimes increase discomfort and metabolic stress in fever. Antipyretic therapy should not be instituted routinely for every febrile episode but should be based on evaluation of relative risks in the individual case and reassessed if anticipated benefits are not achieved.

(Arch Intern Med. 1990;150:1589-1597)




Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Fever in the ICU
Marik
Chest 2000;117:855-869.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Antipyretic Therapy: Physiologic Rationale, Diagnostic Implications, and Clinical Consequences
Plaisance and Mackowiak
Arch Intern Med 2000;160:449-456.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Managing measles
Morley et al.
BMJ 1997;314:1692-1692.
FULL TEXT  

Tepid Sponging to Reduce Temperature in Febrile Children in a Tropical Climate
Mahar et al.
CLIN PEDIATR 1994;33:227-231.
ABSTRACT  

Hyperthermia
Simon
NEJM 1993;329:483-487.
FULL TEXT  

Physicians' Attitudes Toward the Diagnosis And Management of Fever in Children 3 Months to 2 Years of Age
Ipp and Jaffe
CLIN PEDIATR 1993;32:66-70.
ABSTRACT  

Comparison of Multidose Ibuprofen and Acetaminophen Therapy in Febrile Children
Walson et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1992;146:626-632.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.