You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 150 No. 9, September 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Are Two (Inexperienced) Heads Better Than One (Experienced) Head?

Averaging House Officers' Prognostic Judgments for Critically Ill Patients

Roy M. Poses, MD; Carolyn Bekes, MD; Robert L. Winkler, PhD; W. Eric Scott, MD; Fiore J. Copare, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1990;150(9):1874-1878.


Abstract

• Inexperienced physicians may make prognostic judgments and management decisions about acutely ill patients in the absence of supervision. We hypothesized that mathematically combining judgments of junior and senior house officers might yield aggregate judgments as good as those made by experienced critical care attending physicians. We obtained independent quantitative assessments of the likelihood of in-hospital survival for 269 sequential intensive care unit admissions from the patient's intern or resident and the critical care fellow and attending physician on duty within 24 hours of admission, and compared these judgments with mortality data. By logistic regression, the residents' and fellows' judgments added independent prognostic information to each other (likelihood ratio {chi}2,7.6; df = 1). The junior house officers' and fellows' assessments were significantly less reliable than the attending physicians' by calibration curves, and by Brier scores, 0.126 and 0.127 vs 0.119. All physicians had good discriminating ability (receiver operating characteristic areas [SE] were 0.83 [0.03], 0.85 [0.03], 0.86 [0.03], respectively). A simple average of the residents' and fellows' judgments was slightly but significantly more reliable by calibration curve and by Brier score, 0.117, and as discriminating (ROC area=0.85, SE=0.03) as the attending physicians' judgments. Nonmedical studies have shown that averaging independent judgments may compensate for people's tendency to make extreme estimates, and may take advantage of their complementary abilities. This first medical application of this technique suggests that this form of voting by secret ballot may prove useful for health care teams making other judgments and decisions.

(Arch Intern Med. 1990;150:1874-1878)



Footnotes

Accepted for publication March 20,1990.

From the Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Medical College of Virginia, Richmond (Dr Poses); the Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, NC (Dr Winkler); and the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey/Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Camden (Drs Bekes, Scott, and Copare).

Presented in part in abstract form at the National Meeting of the Society for Medical Decision Making, Richmond, Va, October 17-19, 1988.

Reprint requests to Box 102, MCV Station, Richmond, VA 23298 (Dr Poses).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Offering a prognosis in lung cancer: when is a team of experts an expert team?
Kee et al.
J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2007;61:308-313.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Certainty and mortality prediction in critically ill children
Marcin et al.
J. Med. Ethics 2004;30:304-307.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Increased Faculty Presence on Inpatient Teaching Services
Phy et al.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2004;79:332-336.
ABSTRACT  

Complexities in Prognostication in Advanced Cancer: "To Help Them Live Their Lives the Way They Want to"
Lamont and Christakis
JAMA 2003;290:98-104.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Serial Assessment of Mortality in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit by Algorithm and Intuition: Certainty, Uncertainty, and Informed Consent
Meadow et al.
Pediatrics 2002;109:878-886.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prognostic Disclosure to Patients with Cancer near the End of Life
Lamont and Christakis
ANN INTERN MED 2001;134:1096-1105.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Predictive accuracy study: comparing a statistical model to clinicians' estimates of outcomes after coronary bypass surgery
Ivanov et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2000;70:162-168.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prognostication and Certainty in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit
Marcin et al.
Pediatrics 1999;104:868-873.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Predicting outcome in very low birthweight infants using an objective measure of illness severity and cranial ultrasound scanning
Fowlie et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1998;78:175F-178.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Covariance Decomposition of the Probability Score and Its Use in Evaluating Prognostic Estimates: Hal R. Arkes, PhD, Neal V. Dawson, Md, Theodore Speroff, PhD, Frank E. Harrell, Jr., PhD, Carlos Alzola, Ms, Russell Phillips, Md, Norman Desbiens, Md, Robert K. Oye, Md, William Knaus, Md, Alfred F. Connors, Jr., Md, and the Support Investigators
Arkes
Med Decis Making 1995;15:120-131.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.