This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Patrick M. Dunn, MD; Wendy Levinson, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1990;150(9):1917-1919.

Abstract
• It is widely held that the interpretation of a diagnostic test can be biased by clinical information. Many clinicians are cautious about providing information that may bias test interpretation and result in the decreased utility of the test. We quantitatively assessed the effect of clinical information on electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Three cardiologists were asked to give independent written interpretations of 52 ECGs devoid of clinical information. Three weeks later, the same set of ECGs was reinterpreted with clinical information that was either strongly or mildly suggestive of AMI. Of the 156 pooled ECGs, 22 changes (14%) in interpretation with the addition of clinical information were made. Eleven (50%) of the changes were from negative to positive, and 11 were from positive to negative. Changes in interpretation were not affected by the nature of the clinical information or by whether the ECG was typical for AMI. No significant changes in the sensitivity or specificity with the addition of clinical information were present. This study did not demonstrate the anticipated effect of clinical information on the ECG interpretation of AMI. Interpretation of other tests may also be unaffected by the provision of clinical information.

(Arch Intern Med. 1990;150:1917-1919)

Author Affiliations
From the Internal Medicine Training Program and the Department of Medicine, Good Samaritan Hospital and Medical Center and Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland.

Footnotes
Accepted for publication April 6,1990.

Reprints not available.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Accuracy of Diagnostic Tests Read With and Without Clinical Information: A Systematic Review
Loy and Irwig
JAMA 2004;292:1602-1609.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Training and Competency Evaluation for Interpretation of 12-Lead Electrocardiograms: Recommendations from the American College of Physicians
Salerno et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2003;138:747-750.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Competency in Interpretation of 12-Lead Electrocardiograms: A Summary and Appraisal of Published Evidence
Salerno et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2003;138:751-760.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Effects of Proficiency and Bias on Residents' Interpretation of the Microscopic Urinalysis
Flach et al.
Med Decis Making 2002;22:318-325.
ABSTRACT  

Clinical Information: An Indispensable Component of ECG Interpretation-Reply
Dunn and Levinson
Arch Intern Med 1991;151:1236-1236.
ABSTRACT  

Clinical Information: An Indispensable Component of ECG Interpretation
Grauer et al.
Arch Intern Med 1991;151:1232-1236.
ABSTRACT