This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Results of the Massachusetts Model Systems for Blood Cholesterol Screening Project

Stephen Havas, MD, MPH, MS; Joel Reisman, MS; Lily Hsu, MS, RD; Lauren Koumjian, MSc

Arch Intern Med. 1991;151(1):113-119.

Abstract
Several previous studies that looked at the effects of labeling individuals as hypertensive found increases in psychosocial distress, diminished feelings of well-being, or absenteeism. Oth er studies found no such effects. Thus far, similar studies relat ing to labeling for high blood cholesterol levels have not been published. The Massachusetts Model Systems for Blood Choles terol Screening Project investigated whether labeling effects occurred as a result of the community-based screening, educa tion, and referral programs it conducted in Worcester and Lowell. Nine questions concerning perceptions of physical and psycho logical well-being were asked on a questionnaire given to screen ing participants. The same questions were asked as part of a follow-up questionnaire given to all individuals identified as hav ing high blood cholesterol levels at one of the screenings. Com parison of the baseline and follow-up results did not demonstrate significant overall negative effects among any age, sex, racial, income, or educational groups. On the contrary, responses to many of the questions revealed small but statistically significant improvements in perceptions of physical and psychological well-being. The absence of negative labeling effects may be attributable to the positive, supportive approach to participant counseling taken by the project.

(Arch Intern Med. 1991;151:113-119)

Author Affiliations
From the Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Universi ty of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore (Dr Havas); and the Massachu setts Department of Public Health, Boston (Mr Reisman and Mss Hsu and Koumjian).

Footnotes
Accepted for publication July 10, 1990.

Reprint requests to University of Maryland School of Medicine, 655 W Baltimore St, Baltimore, MD 21201 (Dr Havas).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Green land and blue sea: a coloured landscape in the orientation of the sandhopper Talitrus saltator (Montagu) (Amphipoda, Talitridae)
Ugolini et al.
J. Exp. Biol. 2006;209:2509-2514.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Poorer self assessed health in a prospective study of men with screen detected abdominal aortic aneurysm: a predictor or a consequence of screening outcome?
Marteau et al.
J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2004;58:1042-1046.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact of Electron Beam Tomography, With or Without Case Management, on Motivation, Behavioral Change, and Cardiovascular Risk Profile: A Randomized Controlled Trial
O'Malley et al.
JAMA 2003;289:2215-2223.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality of life in a family based genetic cascade screening programme for familial hypercholesterolaemia: a longitudinal study among participants
van Maarle et al.
J. Med. Genet. 2003;40:e3-3.
FULL TEXT  

Changes in health beliefs after labelling with hypercholesterolaemia
Troein et al.
Scand J Public Health 2002;30:76-79.
ABSTRACT  

Effects of a health examination programme on quality of life and subjective well-being
Rose and Bengtsson
Scand J Public Health 1996;24:124-131.
ABSTRACT  

Some Cautions in Labeling Effects
Rudd and Fortmann
Arch Intern Med 1991;151:2313-2313.
ABSTRACT