You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 151 No. 2, FEBRUARY 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behavior of Elderly Persons Regarding Living Wills

Elizabeth R. Gamble, MD, MSPH; Penelope J. McDonald, MD; Peter R. Lichstein, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1991;151(2):277-280.


Abstract

The knowledge, attitudes, and behavior of elderly persons regarding living wills were explored in a rural county in eastern North Carolina. A questionnaire was administered to 75 ambulatory elderly persons by personal interview at community dining sites. Fifty-two percent (39) of these subjects said they were familiar with living wills and 64% (48 persons) correctly summarized what the North Carolina living will says. When asked about preferences for medical care in the setting of a terminal illness, 86% (65 persons) stated a desire to receive basic medical care or comfort care only. Although their preferences were consistent with the provisions of a living will, none had signed the living will document provided by the state of North Carolina, and only two (3%) had discussed a living will with their physician. Seventy (93%) wanted their family or spouse to make decisions about terminal care if they themselves were unable to participate, and discussions between these persons and their chosen proxies actually occurred 45% (34/75) of the time. Eighty-one percent (61 persons) stated a desire to discuss end-of-life care with their physicians, but a minority (eight [11%]) had actually talked with their physicians, and these discussions were usually initiated by the patient (five of eight). We conclude that living will legislation is congruent with the desire of many elderly persons to limit medical care in terminal illness. However, this elderly population did not make use of living wills as a means of indicating their wishes. Recommendations are made to improve physician-patient and patient-proxy communication regarding preferences for medical care at the end of life and living wills. Alternatives to the living will should also be explored.

(Arch Intern Med. 1991;151:277-280)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Medicine, East Carolina University School of Medicine, Greenville, NC.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication August 13, 1990.

Presented in part at the American Geriatrics Society meeting, New Orleans, La, May 14, 1987.

Reprint requests to Department of Medicine, East Carolina University School of Medicine, Greenville, NC 27858-2354 (Dr Gamble).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Surrogate Decision Makers' Understanding of Dementia Patients' Prior Wishes for End-of-Life Care
Black et al.
J Aging Health 2009;21:627-650.
ABSTRACT  

The Views of Older Malaysians on Advanced Directive and Advanced Care Planning: A Qualitative Study
Htut et al.
Asia Pac J Public Health 2007;19:58-66.
ABSTRACT  

The State of Advance Care Planning: One Decade After SUPPORT
Collins et al.
AM J HOSP PALLIAT CARE 2006;23:378-384.
ABSTRACT  

Spouse as Health Care Proxy for Dialysis Patients: Whose Preferences Matter?
Pruchno et al.
Gerontologist 2005;45:812-819.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessing the Ethical and Practical Wisdom of Surrogate Consent for Living Organ Donation
Wendler and Emanuel
JAMA 2004;291:732-735.
FULL TEXT  

Advance Directives among Elderly Veterans
Witte et al.
Journal of Applied Gerontology 2003;22:197-213.
ABSTRACT  

Increasing use of DNR orders in the elderly worldwide: whose choice is it?
Cherniack
J. Med. Ethics 2002;28:303-307.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Advance Directives and Community-Dwelling Older Adults
Hamel et al.
West J Nurs Res 2002;24:143-158.
ABSTRACT  

Patients' Knowledge of Options at the End of Life: Ignorance in the Face of Death
Silveira et al.
JAMA 2000;284:2483-2488.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Preferences for Surrogate Decision Makers, Informal Communication, and Advance Directives Among Community-Dwelling Elders: Results From a National Study
Hopp
Gerontologist 2000;40:449-457.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Views of elderly people on living wills: interview study
Schiff et al.
BMJ 2000;320:1640-1641.
FULL TEXT  

Advance Directives Are More Likely Among Seniors Asked About End-of-Life Care Preferences
Gordon and Shade
Arch Intern Med 1999;159:701-704.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A New Model of Advance Care Planning: Observations From People With HIV
Martin et al.
Arch Intern Med 1999;159:86-92.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Collision of Confinement and Care: End-of-Life Care in Prisons and Jails
Dubler
J Law Med Ethics 1998;26:149-156.
 

Is Experience a Good Teacher?: How Interns and Attending Physicians Understand Patients' Choices for End-of-life Care
Wilson et al.
Med Decis Making 1997;17:217-227.
ABSTRACT  

Advance Directives in Utah: Information From Death Certificates and Informants
Jacobson et al.
Arch Intern Med 1996;156:1862-1868.
ABSTRACT  

Involvement of Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Programs in Advance Directive Education
Heffner and Barbieri
Arch Intern Med 1996;156:1746-1751.
ABSTRACT  

Marked Improvement in Recognition and Completion of Health Care Proxies: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Counseling by Hospital Patient Representatives
Meier et al.
Arch Intern Med 1996;156:1227-1232.
ABSTRACT  

Advance End-of-Life Treatment Planning
Miles et al.
Arch Intern Med 1996;156:1062-1068.
ABSTRACT  

Impact of Advance Directive Videotape on Patient Comprehension and Treatment Preferences
Siegert et al.
Arch Fam Med 1996;5:207-212.
ABSTRACT  

Interventions in Physician-Elderly Patient Interactions
McCormick et al.
Research on Aging 1996;18:103-136.
ABSTRACT  

Factors Promoting Completion of Advance Directives in the Hospital
Cugliari et al.
Arch Intern Med 1995;155:1893-1898.
ABSTRACT  

The Discussion About Advance Directives: Patient and Physician Opinions Regarding When and How It Should Be Conducted
Johnston et al.
Arch Intern Med 1995;155:1025-1030.
ABSTRACT  

Implementation of the Patient Self-Determination Act in a Hospital Setting: An Initial Evaluation
Silverman et al.
Arch Intern Med 1995;155:502-510.
ABSTRACT  

Deciding About Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: The Contributions of Decision Analysis
Sorum
Arch Intern Med 1995;155:513-521.
ABSTRACT  

Elderly Outpatients' Understanding of a Physician-Initiated Advance Directive Discussion
Moore et al.
Arch Fam Med 1994;3:1057-1063.
ABSTRACT  

Physician Reluctance to Discuss Advance Directives: An Empiric Investigation of Potential Barriers
Morrison et al.
Arch Intern Med 1994;154:2311-2318.
ABSTRACT  

Prevalence of Advance Directives and Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders in Community Nursing Facilities
Terry and Zweig
Arch Fam Med 1994;3:141-145.
ABSTRACT  

Increasing the Completion of the Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Rubin et al.
JAMA 1994;271:209-212.
ABSTRACT  

Why are Elderly People Not Using Advance Directives?
High
J Aging Health 1993;5:497-515.
ABSTRACT  

Attitudes to some aspects of death and dying, living wills and substituted health care decision-making in South Australia: public opinion survey for a parliamentary select committee
Ashby and Wakefield
Palliat Med 1993;7:273-282.
ABSTRACT  

Dichotomy in Health Care Policy-Reply
Singer and Lowy
Arch Intern Med 1993;153:260-260.
ABSTRACT  

Proxy Decision Making for Incompetent Patients: An Ethical and Empirical Analysis
Emanuel and Emanuel
JAMA 1992;267:2067-2071.
ABSTRACT  

Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care: A Survey of Senior Center Participants
Roe et al.
Arch Intern Med 1992;152:292-296.
ABSTRACT  

The Patient Self-Determination Act and the Future of Advance Directives
Greco et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1991;115:639-643.
ABSTRACT  

Advance Directives on Admission Clinical Implications and Analysis of the Patient Self-Determination Act of 1990
La Puma et al.
JAMA 1991;266:402-405.
ABSTRACT  

The Patient Self-Determination Act: On Balance, More Help Than Hindrance
White and Fletcher
JAMA 1991;266:410-412.
ABSTRACT  

Insuring the Uninsured Is Not Enough
Dalen and Santiago
Arch Intern Med 1991;151:860-862.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.