You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 151 No. 2, FEBRUARY 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (108)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Decision to Execute a Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care and Preferences Regarding the Utilization of Life-Sustaining Treatments in Nursing Home Residents

Jiska Cohen-Mansfield, PhD; Beth A. Rabinovich, PhD; Steven Lipson, MD; Adele Fein, MSW; Barbara Gerber, MSW; Shulamith Weisman, MA; L. Gregory Pawlson, MD, MPH

Arch Intern Med. 1991;151(2):289-294.


Abstract

One hundred three nursing home residents were interviewed regarding their preferences for the choice of an agent for health-care decision making while being offered the opportunity to execute a Durable Power of Attorney for health care. They also completed a questionnaire that tapped their preferences regarding the use of four types of life-support treatment under three hypothetical levels of future cognitive functioning. Factors that might influence these preferences, such as previous experiences with life-sustaining treatments, religious beliefs, and personal values, were also examined. Participants tended to choose their son or daughter as their agent for future health-care decision making. They had clear and consistent patterns of preferences regarding the utilization of life-sustaining treatment. Generally, participants opted not to be treated, although there was variability among participants. They were even less inclined to opt for treatment as their perceived level of future cognitive functioning declined, or when the life-sustaining treatment involved permanent rather than temporary procedures.

(Arch Intern Med. 1991;151:289-294)



Author Affiliations

From the Research Institute of the Hebrew Home of Greater Washington, Rockville, Md (Drs Cohen-Mansfield and Rabinovich); Georgetown University Center on Aging, Washington, DC (Dr Cohen-Mansfield); Hebrew Home of Greater Washington, Rockville, Md (Dr Lipson and Mss Fein, Gerber, and Weisman); and George Washington University, Washington, DC (Dr Pawlson).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication August 13, 1990.

Presented at the annual meeting of the Gerontological Association, Minneapolis, Minn, November 1989.

Reprint requests to the Research Institute of the Hebrew Home of Greater Washington, 6121 Montrose Rd, Rockville, MD 20852 (Dr Cohen-Mansfield).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Care Alternatives in Prison Systems: Factors Influencing End-of-Life Treatment Selection
Phillips et al.
Criminal Justice and Behavior 2009;36:620-634.
ABSTRACT  

Affective Forecasting and Advance Care Planning: Anticipating Quality of Life in Future Health Statuses
Winter et al.
J Health Psychol 2009;14:447-456.
ABSTRACT  

Review of measurement instruments in clinical and research ethics, 1999-2003.
Redman
J. Med. Ethics 2006;32:153-156.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Advance care planning among residents in long-term care
McAuley and Travis
AM J HOSP PALLIAT CARE 2003;20:353-359.
ABSTRACT  

Advance Directives among Elderly Veterans
Witte et al.
Journal of Applied Gerontology 2003;22:197-213.
ABSTRACT  

The Influence of Cultural Diversity on End-of-life Care and Decisions
WERTH et al.
American Behavioral Scientist 2002;46:204-219.
ABSTRACT  

Increasing use of DNR orders in the elderly worldwide: whose choice is it?
Cherniack
J. Med. Ethics 2002;28:303-307.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

What Impact Do Setting and Transitions Have on the Quality of Life at the End of Life and the Quality of the Dying Process?
Mezey et al.
Gerontologist 2002;42:54-67.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Development of a Framework to Encourage Addressing Advance Directives When Resources Are Limited
Cohen-Mansfield
J Aging Health 2002;14:24-41.
ABSTRACT  

Health Care Decisions of Older Adults: Underlying Influences, Cognitive Status, and Perceived Outcomes
Roberto et al.
Journal of Applied Gerontology 2001;20:74-90.
ABSTRACT  

Modal Preferences Predict Elderly Patients' Life-sustaining Treatment Choices as Well as Patients' Chosen Surrogates Do
Smucker et al.
Med Decis Making 2000;20:271-280.
ABSTRACT  

The Attitudes of Patients With Advanced AIDS Toward Use of the Medical Futility Rationale in Decisions to Forgo Mechanical Ventilation
Curtis et al.
Arch Intern Med 2000;160:1597-1601.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A New Model of Advance Care Planning: Observations From People With HIV
Martin et al.
Arch Intern Med 1999;159:86-92.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Diagnosis and Treatment of Alzheimer Disease and Related Disorders: Consensus Statement of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry, the Alzheimer's Association, and the American Geriatrics Society
Small et al.
JAMA 1997;278:1363-1371.
ABSTRACT  

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders in the Nursing Home
Zweig
Arch Fam Med 1997;6:424-429.
ABSTRACT  

Is Economic Hardship on the Families of the Seriously Ill Associated With Patient and Surrogate Care Preferences?
Covinsky et al.
Arch Intern Med 1996;156:1737-1741.
ABSTRACT  

Marked Improvement in Recognition and Completion of Health Care Proxies: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Counseling by Hospital Patient Representatives
Meier et al.
Arch Intern Med 1996;156:1227-1232.
ABSTRACT  

Advance End-of-Life Treatment Planning
Miles et al.
Arch Intern Med 1996;156:1062-1068.
ABSTRACT  

Who Decides? Physicians' Willingness to Use Life-Sustaining Treatment
Hanson et al.
Arch Intern Med 1996;156:785-789.
ABSTRACT  

Interventions in Physician-Elderly Patient Interactions
McCormick et al.
Research on Aging 1996;18:103-136.
ABSTRACT  

The SPIRITual History
Maugans
Arch Fam Med 1996;5:11-16.
ABSTRACT  

Decisions About Life-Sustaining Treatment: Impact of Physicians' Behaviors on the Family
Tilden et al.
Arch Intern Med 1995;155:633-638.
ABSTRACT  

Deciding About Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: The Contributions of Decision Analysis
Sorum
Arch Intern Med 1995;155:513-521.
ABSTRACT  

Changes in Decisions by Elderly Persons Based on Treatment Description
Ainslie and Beisecker
Arch Intern Med 1994;154:2225-2233.
ABSTRACT  

The Physician Decision-Making Process in Transferring Nursing Home Patients to the Hospital
Brooks et al.
Arch Intern Med 1994;154:902-908.
ABSTRACT  

Prevalence of Advance Directives and Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders in Community Nursing Facilities
Terry and Zweig
Arch Fam Med 1994;3:141-145.
ABSTRACT  

Advance Directives: Stability of Patients' Treatment Choices
Emanuel et al.
Arch Intern Med 1994;154:209-217.
ABSTRACT  

Increasing the Completion of the Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Rubin et al.
JAMA 1994;271:209-212.
ABSTRACT  

Prevalence of Advance Directives and Guardianship in Nursing Home Patients
Janofsky and Rovner
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 1993;6:214-216.
ABSTRACT  

Proxy Decision Making for Incompetent Patients: An Ethical and Empirical Analysis
Emanuel and Emanuel
JAMA 1992;267:2067-2071.
ABSTRACT  

Procedures for Making Medical Decisions for Incompetent Adults
Lynn
JAMA 1992;267:2082-2084.
ABSTRACT  

Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care: A Survey of Senior Center Participants
Roe et al.
Arch Intern Med 1992;152:292-296.
ABSTRACT  

Insuring the Uninsured Is Not Enough
Dalen and Santiago
Arch Intern Med 1991;151:860-862.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.