You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 151 No. 2, FEBRUARY 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Comparative Study of a Microporous Cholestyramine Analogue (Filicol) and Gemfibrozil for Treatment of Severe Primary Hypercholesterolemia

Short- and Long-term Results

Emilio Ros, MD; Daniel Zambón, MD; Antonia Bertomeu, MD; Eulalia Cusó, PhD; Carolina Sanllehy, PhD; Elena Casals, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1991;151(2):301-305.


Abstract



The hypolipidemic effect of gemfibrozil in severe hypercholesterolemia is not well established. Fifty patients with primary hypercholesterolemia (including 18 patients with familial hypercholesterolemia) and stable low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels greater than 3.90 mmol/L (>150 mg/dL) (6.10 1.30 [SD] mmol/L; 236 ±50 mg/dL) while on a hypolipidemic diet were assigned to treatment for 12 weeks with either 9 g/d of filicol, a microporous cholestyramine analogue, or 1.2 g/d of gemfibrozil in a randomized clinical trial. Tolerance was good with both drugs. Filicol and gemfibrozil caused similar decrements of total cholesterol (14% for both), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (20% and 18%, respectively), and apolipoprotein B (16% and 21%, respectively). Close to 40% of the patients had decreases of greater than 25% in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels with both drugs. Gemfibrozil, but not filicol, significantly increased plasma high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (16%) and apolipoprotein A-I (17%) levels and reduced triglyceride levels (35%). No loss of efficacy was observed with either drug in subsets of patients who had a good 12-week response rate and had extended therapy for up to 12 months. This study demonstrates that gemfibrozil may have a beneficial effect on all aspects of the plasma lipid profile in patients with severe hypercholesterolemia, a clinical situation where it can be used with potential advantages over standard doses of anion-exchange resins.

(Arch Intern Med. 1991;151:301-305)



Author Affiliations



From the Lipid Clinic (Gastroenterology Service) (Drs Ros, Zambón, and Bertomeu) and the Department of Biochemistry (Drs Cusó, Sanllehy, and Casals), Hospital Clinic i Provincial, Barcelona (Spain) Medical School.


Footnotes



Accepted for publication July 11, 1990.

Presented in part to the eighth International Symposium on Atherosclerosis, Rome, Italy, October 13, 1988.

Reprint requests to Lipid Clinic, Hospital Clinic i Provincial, Calle Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain (Dr Ros).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.