This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (63)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Dodging the Rules, Ruling the Dodgers

E. Haavi Morreim, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 1991;151(3):443-447.

Abstract
Although traditional obligations of fidelity require physicians to deliver quality care to their patients, including to utilize costly technologies, physicians are steadily losing their accustomed control over the necessary resources. The "economic agents" who own the medical and monetary resources of care now impose a wide array of rules and restrictions in order to contain their costs of operation. However, physicians can still control resources indirectly through "gaming the system," employing tactics such as "fudging" that exploit resource rules' ambiguity and flexibility to bypass the rules while ostensibly honoring them. Physicians may be especially inclined to game the system where resource rules seriously underserve patients' needs, where economic agents seem to be "gaming the patient," with needless obstacles to care, or where others, such as hospitals or even physicians themselves, may be denied needed reimbursements. Though tempting, gaming is morally and medically hazardous. It can harm patients and society, offend honesty, and violate basic principles of contractual and distributive justice. It is also, in fact, usually unnecessary in securing needed resources for patients. More fundamentally, we must reconsider what physicians owe their patients. They owe what is theirs to give: their competence, care and loyalty. In light of medicine's changing economics, two new duties emerge: economic advising, whereby physicians explicitly discuss the economic as well as medical aspects of each treatment option; and economic advocacy, whereby physicians intercede actively on their patients' behalf with the economic agents who control the resources.

(Arch Intern Med. 1991;151:443-447)

Author Affiliations
From the Department of Human Values and Ethics, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee, Memphis.

Footnotes
Accepted for publication August 13, 1990.

Reprints not available.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Professionalism in Pediatrics
Fallat et al.
Pediatrics 2007;120:e1123-e1133.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Physicians' Interactions With Third-Party Payers: Is Deception Necessary?
Bogardus et al.
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:1841-1844.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessing the Influence of Incentives on Physicians and Medical Groups
Town et al.
Med Care Res Rev 2004;61:80S-118S.
ABSTRACT  

Ethics in Practice: Managed Care and the Changing Health Care Environment: Medicine as a Profession Managed Care Ethics Working Group Statement
Povar et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2004;141:131-136.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Costs of Denying Scarcity
Alexander et al.
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:593-596.
FULL TEXT  

Lying for the Patient's Good
Capozzi and Rhodes
JBJS 2004;86:187-188.
FULL TEXT  

Support for Physician Deception of Insurance Companies among a Sample of Philadelphia Residents
Alexander et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2003;138:472-475.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Coding of Pediatric Behavioral and Mental Disorders
Rushton et al.
Pediatrics 2002;110:e8-8.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Measuring Deception: Test-Retest Reliability of Physicians' Self-Reported Manipulation of Reimbursement Rules for Patients
VanGeest et al.
Med Care Res Rev 2002;59:184-196.
ABSTRACT  

The "Hassle Factor": What Motivates Physicians to Manipulate Reimbursement Rules?
Werner et al.
Arch Intern Med 2002;162:1134-1139.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Deceiving insurance companies: new expression of an ancient tradition
Sade
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2001;72:1449-1453.
FULL TEXT  

Should Physicians Manipulate Reimbursement Rules to Benefit Patients?
O'Neal et al.
JAMA 2000;284:1382-1383.
FULL TEXT  

Lying to Each Other: When Internal Medicine Residents Use Deception With Their Colleagues
Green et al.
Arch Intern Med 2000;160:2317-2323.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Physician Manipulation of Reimbursement Rules for Patients: Between a Rock and a Hard Place
Wynia et al.
JAMA 2000;283:1858-1865.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Physicians' Duties in an Era of Cost Containment: Advocacy or Betrayal?
Ubel
JAMA 1999;282:1675-1675.
FULL TEXT  

Should Doctors Ever Lie on Behalf of Patients?
Kinghorn
JAMA 1999;282:1674-1675.
FULL TEXT  

Lying for Patients: Physician Deception of Third-Party Payers
Freeman et al.
Arch Intern Med 1999;159:2263-2270.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Unbearable Rightness of Bedside Rationing: Physician Duties in a Climate of Cost Containment
Ubel and Arnold
Arch Intern Med 1995;155:1837-1842.
ABSTRACT  

Behind the Curve: A Critical Assessment of How Little is Known about Arrangements between Managed Care Plans and Physicians
Gold et al.
Med Care Res Rev 1995;52:307-341.
ABSTRACT  

Ethical Issues in Managed Care: Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association
Glasson et al.
JAMA 1995;273:330-335.
ABSTRACT  

Ethics
Pellegrino
JAMA 1994;271:1668-1670.
ABSTRACT  

Physicians' Autonomy -- The Relation between Public and Professional Expectations
Mirvis
NEJM 1993;328:1346-1349.
FULL TEXT  

Whodunit? Causal Responsibility of Utilization Review for Physicians'Decisions, Patients'Outcomes
Morreim
J Law Med Ethics 1992;20:40-56.