You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 151 No. 3, MARCH 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (31)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Suboptimal Response to Hepatitis B Vaccine in Drug Users

Mariagrazia Rumi, MD; Massimo Colombo, MD; Raffaella Romeo, MD; Antonio Boschini, MD; Alessandro Zanetti, BSc; Alessandro Gringeri, MD; Pier Mannuccio Mannucci, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1991;151(3):574-578.


Abstract



Fifty-five drug users institutionalized in a community for drug detoxification were vaccinated against hepatitis B virus (HBV) with a recombinant yeast-derived vaccine (Engerix B, Smith Kline Biologicals, Belgium). At 0,1, and 6 months, 20 µg of vaccine was given in the deltoid to these patients, of whom 17 had no serum HBV markers, 15 had only the antibody to core antigen (anti-HBc), and 23 had anti-HBc and antibody to the surface antigen (anti-HBs) values lower than the allegedly "protective" value of 10 mIU/mL. Forty-one healthy controls were vaccinated in parallel. At month 7 (ie, 1 month after the third dose of vaccine), in 76% (13/17) of drug users with no HBV markers, 6% (1/15) of those with isolated anti-HBc, and 69% (16/23) of those with antiHBc and nonprotective anti-HBs, protective anti-HBs titers (≥ 10 mIU/mL) developed, compared with 97% (40/41) of controls. At month 24, these rates fell to 43% for drug users with no HBV marker, 0% for those with anti-HBc, 31% for those with anti-HBc and anti-HBs, and 86% for controls. The drug users who did not respond to vaccination were more likely to be those with evidence of prior HBV infection and anergy to skin tests. This indicates that unresponsiveness to hepatitis B vaccine in drug users may be due to altered immunity.

(Arch Intern Med. 1991;151:574-578)



Author Affiliations



From the Institute of Internal Medicine (Drs Rumi, Colombo, Romeo and Boschini), A. Bianchi Bonomi Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center (Drs Gringeri and Mannucci), and Institute of Virology (Dr Zanetti), University of Milan (Italy).


Footnotes



Accepted for publication August 28, 1990.

Reprint requests to via Pace 9, 20122 Milano, Italy (Dr Colombo).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Accelerated Hepatitis B Vaccination Schedule among Drug Users: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Hwang et al.
The Journal of Infectious Disease 2010;202:1500-1509.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Hepatitis A Virus Vaccination among Injecting Drug Users: Do We Have to Change the Vaccination Schedule?
Lugoboni et al.
Clinical Infectious Diseases 2000;31:847-848.
FULL TEXT  

Oral Effects of Drug Abuse
Rees
CROBM 1992;3:163-184.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.