You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 151 No. 4, APRIL 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Neglected Medical History and Therapeutic Choices for Abdominal Pain

A Nationwide Study of 799 Physicians and Nurses

Jerry Avorn, MD; Daniel E. Everitt, MD; Merl W. Baker

Arch Intern Med. 1991;151(4):694-698.


Abstract

A random national sample of 501 physicians and 298 nurse practitioners was presented a case vignette describing a patient with epigastric pain and endoscopy showing diffuse gastritis. Respondents were encouraged to request further information and then were asked for recommendations. History available if requested included substantial use of aspirin, coffee, cigarettes, and alcohol, and severe psychosocial stress. More than one third of the physicians chose to initiate therapy without seeking relevant history. Nearly half of all physicians indicated that a prescription would be the single most effective therapy; 65% recommended a histamine antagonist. By contrast, only 19% of nurse practitioners opted to treat without taking further history; the nurse sample asked an average of 2.6 questions vs 1.6 for physicians; only 20% of the nurses recommended a prescription medication. These findings raise concerns about the adequacy of basic history taking in this setting and the underuse of nonpharmacologic approaches in favor of excessive reliance on prescription drugs, even when not indicated by clinical circumstances.

(Arch Intern Med. 1991;151:694-698)



Author Affiliations

From the Program for the Analysis of Clinical Strategies and the Geriatric Research and Training Center, Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Hospital, Boston, Mass (Drs Avorn and Everitt); Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Brockton/West Roxbury Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Boston, and Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Hospital (Dr Everitt); and Louis Harris and Associates Inc, New York, NY (Mr Baker).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication October 9, 1990.

Reprint requests to Program for the Analysis of Clinical Strategies, 333 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115 (Dr Avorn).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Primary Care Outcomes in Patients treated by Nurse Practitioners or Physicians: Two-Year Follow-Up
Lenz et al.
Med Care Res Rev 2004;61:332-351.
ABSTRACT  

Current topic: Implications of the Crown Report and nurse prescribing
Stephenson
Arch. Dis. Child. 2000;83:199-202.
FULL TEXT  

Clinicians' and Seniors' Views of Reference- Based Pricing: Two Sides of a Coin
Mullett and Coughlan
Journal of Applied Gerontology 1998;17:296-317.
ABSTRACT  

Does This Patient Have Appendicitis?
Wagner et al.
JAMA 1996;276:1589-1594.
ABSTRACT  

Advanced Practice Nurses: Should They Be Independent?
Rudy
Arch Fam Med 1995;4:14-16.
ABSTRACT  

Advanced-Practice Nursing -- Good Medicine for Physicians?
Mundinger
NEJM 1994;330:211-214.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.