You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 151 No. 7, JULY 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (32)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Aneroid Sphygmomanometers

An Assessment of Accuracy at a University Hospital and Clinics

Richard H. Bailey; Vicki L. Knaus, MSN; John H. Bauer, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1991;151(7):1409-1412.


Abstract

Defects of aneroid sphygmomanometers are a source of error in blood pressure measurement. We inspected 230 aneroid sphygmomanometers for physical defects and compared their accuracy against a standard mercury manometer at five different pressure points. An aneroid sphygmomanometer was defined as intolerant if it deviated from the mercury manometer by greater than ± 3 mm Hg at two or more of the test points. The three most common physical defects were indicator needles not pointing to the "zero box," cracked face plates, and defective tubing. Eighty (34.8 of the 230 aneroid sphygmomanometers were determined to be intolerant with the greatest frequency of deviation seen at pressure levels of 150 mm Hg or greater. We recommend that aneroid manometers be inspected for physical defects and calibrated for accuracy against a standard mercury manometer at 6-month intervals to prevent inaccurate blood pressure measurements.

(Arch Intern Med. 1991;151:1409-1412)



Author Affiliations

From the Hypertension Section, Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication January 22, 1991.

Reprint requests to Department of Medicine, Hypertension Section N403, University of Missouri, One Hospital Dr, Columbia, MO 65212 (Dr Bauer).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Measuring blood pressure: pitfalls and recommendations
Tholl et al.
Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004;19:766-770.
FULL TEXT  

Are Aneroid Sphygmomanometers Accurate in Hospital and Clinic Settings?
Canzanello et al.
Arch Intern Med 2001;161:729-731.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Home Blood Pressure Monitoring
Yarows et al.
Arch Intern Med 2000;160:1251-1257.
FULL TEXT  

A Review of Common Errors in the Indirect Measurement of Blood Pressure: Sphygmomanometry
Bailey and Bauer
Arch Intern Med 1993;153:2741-2748.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.