This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Alan Meisel, JD

Arch Intern Med. 1991;151(8):1497-1502.

Abstract
There are a number of myths about what the law permits concerning the termination of life support, some of which spring from a fundamental misconception of what law is. A serious misunderstanding of the law can lead to tragic results for physicians, health care institutions, patients, and families. These misunderstandings are (1) anything that is not specifically permitted by law is prohibited; (2) termination of life support is murder or suicide; (3) a patient must be terminally ill for life support to be stopped; (4) it is permissible to terminate extraordinary treatments, but not ordinary ones; (5) it is permissible to withhold treatment, but once started, it must be continued; (6) stopping tube feeding is legally different from stopping other treatments; (7) termination of life support requires going to court; and (8) living wills are not legal.

(Arch Intern Med. 1991;151:1497-1502)

Author Affiliations
From the Center for Medical Ethics, University of Pittsburgh (Pa).

Footnotes
Accepted for publication December 31, 1990.

Reprint requests to 3900 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 (Dr Meisel).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Allowing Patients to Die: Practical, Ethical, and Religious Concerns
Kahn et al.
JCO 2003;21:3000-3002.
FULL TEXT  

'End-of-life' decision making within intensive care - objective, consistent, defensible?
Ravenscroft and Bell
J. Med. Ethics 2000;26:435-440.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Seven Legal Barriers to End-of-Life Care: Myths, Realities, and Grains of Truth
Meisel et al.
JAMA 2000;284:2495-2501.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Palliative Treatments of Last Resort: Choosing the Least Harmful Alternative
Quill et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2000;132:488-493.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A New Doctor in the House: Ethical Issues in Hospitalist Systems
Pantilat et al.
JAMA 1999;282:171-174.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prosecutors and End-of-Life Decision Making
Meisel et al.
Arch Intern Med 1999;159:1089-1095.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

'You Promised Me I Wouldn't Die Like This!' A Bad Death as a Medical Emergency
Quill and Brody
Arch Intern Med 1995;155:1250-1254.
ABSTRACT  

Euthanasia: Historical, Ethical, and Empiric Perspectives
Emanuel
Arch Intern Med 1994;154:1890-1901.
ABSTRACT  

Tube Feeding: Internists' Attitudes Regarding Ethical Obligations
Hodges et al.
Arch Intern Med 1994;154:1013-1020.
ABSTRACT  

Patient Refusal of Hydration and Nutrition: An Alternative to Physician-Assisted Suicide or Voluntary Active Euthanasia
Bernat et al.
Arch Intern Med 1993;153:2723-2731.
ABSTRACT  

Continuing Problems with Patient Self-Determination
White et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 1993;8:187-193.
ABSTRACT  

Practical Problems in the Withdrawal of Nutrition and Hydration From Two Patients in a Persistent Vegetative State
Richardson and Keay
Arch Fam Med 1993;2:981-986.
ABSTRACT  

Limits of Patient Autonomy: Physician Attitudes and Practices Regarding Life-Sustaining Treatments and Euthanasia
Fried et al.
Arch Intern Med 1993;153:722-728.
ABSTRACT  

Terminal Dehydration, a Compassionate Treatment
Arch Intern Med 1992;152:697-700.
ABSTRACT