 |
|
Changes in Physician Attitudes Toward Limiting Care of Critically Ill Patients
Renee M. Goetzler, MD, MPH;
Mark A. Moskowitz, MD
Arch Intern Med. 1991;151(8):1537-1540.
Abstract
To determine whether physician attitudes toward decision making in the care of critically ill patients have changed, a survey of physicians was conducted in 1981 and repeated in 1988. physicians in 1988 were more comfortable discussing "do-not-resuscitate" options with patients and were more likely to allow a critically ill patient to die if the patient so requested. Most physicians in both surveys believe that treatment costs should not play a role in medical decisions. Trainees in 1988 were more aggressive in their management of case studies than were faculty in 1988 or trainees in 1981. While in both years the most important factors in the decision to treat aggressively were a patient's expressed desire to live or die and the amount of patient suffering, physicians in 1988 ranked malpractice concerns as a more important determinant in their decision process compared with physicians in 1981. Significant changes in physician attitudes toward the care of critically ill patients have occurred during this decade.
(Arch Intern Med. 1991;151:1537-1540)
Author Affiliations
From the Health Care Research Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Evans Memorial Department of Clinical Research, Boston University School of Medicine (Dr Moskowitz), and the Department of Medicine, Carney Hospital (Dr Goetzler), Boston, Mass.
Footnotes
Accepted for publication January 17, 1991.
Presented at the national meeting of the American Federation of Clinical Research, Washington, DC, April 28, 1989.
Reprint requests to Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University Medical Center, 720 Harrison Ave, Suite 1108, Boston, MA 02118 (Dr Moskowitz).
 CiteULike  Connotea  Delicious  Digg  Facebook  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Development and Utilization of Vignettes in Assessing Medical Students' Support of Older and Younger Patients' Medical Decisions
Schigelone and Fitzgerald
Eval Health Prof 2004;27:265-284.
ABSTRACT
Increasing use of DNR orders in the elderly worldwide: whose choice is it?
Cherniack
J. Med. Ethics 2002;28:303-307.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Use of Living Wills at the End of Life: A National Study
Hanson and Rodgman
Arch Intern Med 1996;156:1018-1022.
ABSTRACT
Who Decides? Physicians' Willingness to Use Life-Sustaining Treatment
Hanson et al.
Arch Intern Med 1996;156:785-789.
ABSTRACT
Terminal Care of the Very Old: Changes in the Way We Die
Hesse
Arch Intern Med 1995;155:1513-1518.
ABSTRACT
Age as a Factor in Critical Care Unit Admissions
Nuckton and List
Arch Intern Med 1995;155:1087-1092.
ABSTRACT
Can We Talk? Inpatient Discussions About Advance Directives in a Community Hospital: Attending Physicians' Attitudes, Their Inpatients' Wishes, and Reported Experience
Reilly et al.
Arch Intern Med 1994;154:2299-2308.
ABSTRACT
Cost-effectiveness of Monoclonal Antibodies to Gram-negative Endotoxin in the Treatment of Gram-negative Sepsis in ICU Patients
Chalfin et al.
JAMA 1993;269:249-254.
ABSTRACT
Implementation of Advance Directives: For Physicians, a Legal Dilemma Becomes an Ethical Imperative
McIntyre
Arch Intern Med 1992;152:925-929.
ABSTRACT
|
