You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 151 No. 8, AUGUST 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

National Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting

1984-1989

Gerald A. Faich, MD, MPH

Arch Intern Med. 1991;151(8):1645-1647.


Abstract

Surveillance of adverse reactions due to pharmaceuticals is important because the drug approval process cannot totally assure safety and because new knowledge is bound to accrue after drugs enter usual medical practice. Reporting of reactions to the Food and Drug Administration increased markedly between 1985 and 1989 and totaled 261 515 reports for this period. A large part of this increase was due to new legal requirements, which ensure that manufacturers report reactions to the Food and Drug Administration. Most reaction reports originated with practicing physicians who contacted drug manufacturers. High proportions of the reports involved new drugs and serious reactions. Reaction surveillance leads to 50 to 100 important safety investigations annually and to numerous changes in product information. Health care providers must continue to report suspect adverse reactions to the Food and Drug Administration and manufacturers if pharmaceutical use and safety are to improve.

(Arch Intern Med. 1991;151:1645-1647)



Author Affiliations

From the Office of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, Md. Dr Faich is now with the Philadelphia Association for Clinical Trials, St Davids, Pa. The opinions expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the Food and Drug Administration policy.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication February 18, 1991.

Reprint requests to Suite D200, 150 Radnor-Chester Rd, St Davids, PA 19087 (Dr Faich).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Safety and Tolerability of Topiramate in Children
Levisohn
J Child Neurol 2000;15:S22-S26.
ABSTRACT  

Patient Risk Factors for Adverse Drug Events in Hospitalized Patients
Bates et al.
Arch Intern Med 1999;159:2553-2560.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Identifying Adverse Drug Events: Development of a Computer-based Monitor and Comparison with Chart Review and Stimulated Voluntary Report
Jha et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 1998;5:305-314.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Incidence of Adverse Drug Events and Potential Adverse Drug Events: Implications for Prevention
Bates et al.
JAMA 1995;274:29-34.
ABSTRACT  

Postmarketing Surveillance: Beyond medWatch
Faich
JAMA 1993;270:2180-2180.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.