 |
 |

National Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting1984-1989
Gerald A. Faich, MD, MPH
Arch Intern Med. 1991;151(8):1645-1647.
Abstract
 |  |
Surveillance of adverse reactions due to pharmaceuticals is important because the drug approval process cannot totally assure safety and because new knowledge is bound to accrue after drugs enter usual medical practice. Reporting of reactions to the Food and Drug Administration increased markedly between 1985 and 1989 and totaled 261 515 reports for this period. A large part of this increase was due to new legal requirements, which ensure that manufacturers report reactions to the Food and Drug Administration. Most reaction reports originated with practicing physicians who contacted drug manufacturers. High proportions of the reports involved new drugs and serious reactions. Reaction surveillance leads to 50 to 100 important safety investigations annually and to numerous changes in product information. Health care providers must continue to report suspect adverse reactions to the Food and Drug Administration and manufacturers if pharmaceutical use and safety are to improve.
(Arch Intern Med. 1991;151:1645-1647)
Author Affiliations
From the Office of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, Md. Dr Faich is now with the Philadelphia Association for Clinical Trials, St Davids, Pa. The opinions expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the Food and Drug Administration policy.
Footnotes
Accepted for publication February 18, 1991.
Reprint requests to Suite D200, 150 Radnor-Chester Rd, St Davids, PA 19087 (Dr Faich).
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Safety and Tolerability of Topiramate in Children
Levisohn
J Child Neurol 2000;15:S22-S26.
ABSTRACT
Patient Risk Factors for Adverse Drug Events in Hospitalized Patients
Bates et al.
Arch Intern Med 1999;159:2553-2560.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Identifying Adverse Drug Events: Development of a Computer-based Monitor and Comparison with Chart Review and Stimulated Voluntary Report
Jha et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 1998;5:305-314.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Incidence of Adverse Drug Events and Potential Adverse Drug Events: Implications for Prevention
Bates et al.
JAMA 1995;274:29-34.
ABSTRACT
Postmarketing Surveillance: Beyond medWatch
Faich
JAMA 1993;270:2180-2180.
ABSTRACT
|