You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 151 No. 9, SEPTEMBER 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (17)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Feasibility of Universal Screening Mammography

Lessons From a Community Intervention

Mary E. Costanza, MD; Carl J. D'Orsi, MD; Harry L. Greene, MD; Victoria P. Gaw, RN, MA; Andrew Karellas, PhD; Jane G. Zapka, ScD

Arch Intern Med. 1991;151(9):1851-1856.


Abstract

It is estimated that 44 500 American women will die of breast cancer in 1991. The breast cancer screening guidelines of the American Cancer Society and the National Cancer Institute calling for annual mammography for all women older than 50 years have been endorsed by numerous professional groups. Third-party reimbursement for screening mammography is becoming more prevalent, and payment for screening mammography is now a Medicare benefit. Our studies, conducted as part of a National Cancer Institute grant to increase the routine use of screening mammography and clinical breast examination in women 50 to 75 years of age, have uncovered a number of significant barriers to the implementation of screening guidelines among women, primary care physicians, and providers of mammography services. These barriers, as well as methods to assure the quality of mammography, need to be addressed before universal screening is feasible.

(Arch Intern Med. 1991;151:1851-1856)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Medicine (Dr Costanza and Ms Gaw) and Radiology (Drs D'Orsi and Karellas), University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester; the Department of Medicine, University of Arizona Medical School, Tucson (Dr Greene); and the School of Public Health, University of Massachusetts, Amherst (Dr Zapka).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication March 29, 1991.

Reprint requests to Division of Oncology, University of Massachusetts, 55 Lake Ave N, Worcester, MA 01655 (Dr Costanza).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Effect of Direct Mail as a Population-Based Strategy to Increase Mammography Use among Low-Income Underinsured Women Ages 40 to 64 Years
Slater et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:2346-2352.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Coming to Terms with the Risk of Breast Cancer: Perceptions of Women with Primary Relatives with Breast Cancer
Chalmers and Thomson
Qual Health Res 1996;6:256-282.
ABSTRACT  

Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Among Underserved Women: Baseline Survey Results From Six States
The National Cancer Institute Cancer Screening Con
Arch Fam Med 1995;4:617-624.
ABSTRACT  

Is Cost a Barrier to Screening Mammography for Low-Income Women Receiving Medicare Benefits? A Randomized Trial
Kiefe et al.
Arch Intern Med 1994;154:1217-1224.
ABSTRACT  

Breast Cancer Screening among Women from 65 to 74 Years of Age in 1987-88 and 1991
Coleman et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1992;117:961-966.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.