You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 152 No. 1, JANUARY 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Optimal Management of Suspected Lower-Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis

An Evaluation With Cost Assessment of 24 Management Strategies

Bruce E. Hillner, MD; John T. Philbrick, MD; Daniel M. Becker, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1992;152(1):165-175.


Abstract

Traditionally, patients suspected to have lower-extremity deep vein thrombosis have undergone venography, which is invasive, is expensive, and may cause deep vein thrombosis in healthy individuals. Recent studies have shown the safety and efficacy of alternative noninvasive approaches that employ impedance plethysmography or real-time ultrasonography. We compared these tests using decision analysis to model the consequences of 24 different management strategies for ambulatory patients suspected to have deep vein thrombosis. We also calculated the incremental cost per additional life saved for each strategy. Our analysis revealed that the optimal approach was to perform real-time ultrasonography followed by anticoagulation therapy if deep vein thrombosis is found. This approach was both effective and cost saving compared with no testing or treatment. Serial follow-up studies of patients whose initial study suggested no DVT saved additional lives, but at a cost of $390 000 per each additional life saved for patients with one follow-up study and $3.5 million per each additional life saved for patients with a second follow-up study. Venography should play a limited role in the contemporary evaluation of patients suspected to have deep vein thrombosis. Future research should focus on the determination of clinical predictors of patients who should undergo serial examinations.

(Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:165-175)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Internal Medicine, Divisions of General Medicine, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (Dr Hillner), and the University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville (Drs Philbrick and Becker).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication June 28, 1991.

Reprint requests to MCV Station, Box 170, Richmond, VA 23298-0170 (Dr Hillner).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Parametric Sensitivity Analysis Using Large-Sample Approximate Bayesian Posterior Distributions
Hazen and Huang
Decision Analysis 2006;3:208-219.
ABSTRACT  

Diagnosis and treatment of deep-vein thrombosis.
Scarvelis and Wells
CMAJ 2006;175:1087-1092.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

How should we diagnose suspected deep-vein thrombosis?
Goodacre et al.
QJM 2006;99:377-388.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Augmentation in Lower Extremity Sonography for the Detection of Deep Venous Thrombosis
Lockhart et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2005;184:419-422.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Survival Impact of Tamoxifen Use for Breast Cancer Risk Reduction: Projections from a Patient-Specific Markov Model
Col et al.
Med Decis Making 2002;22:386-393.
ABSTRACT  

Is It Safe to Withhold Anticoagulation Based on a Single Negative Color Duplex Examination in Patients with Suspected Deep Venous Thrombosis? A Prospective 3-Month Follow-up Study
Noren et al.
ANGIOLOGY 2002;53:521-527.
ABSTRACT  

Diagnosis of Lower-Limb Deep Venous Thrombosis: A Prospective Blinded Study of Magnetic Resonance Direct Thrombus Imaging
Fraser et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2002;136:89-98.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Individualizing Therapy to Prevent Long-term Consequences of Estrogen Deficiency in Postmenopausal Women
Col et al.
Arch Intern Med 1999;159:1458-1466.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Economic Analysis of Low-Dose Heparin vs the Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Enoxaparin for Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism After Colorectal Surgery
Etchells et al.
Arch Intern Med 1999;159:1221-1228.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Deep Venous Thrombosis: Recent Advances and Optimal Investigation with US
Fraser and Anderson
Radiology 1999;211:9-24.
FULL TEXT  

Clinical overview of venous thromboembolism
Goldhaber
Vasc Med 1998;3:35-40.
ABSTRACT  

Decision-theoretic Refinement Planning in Medical Decision Making: Management of Acute Deep Venous Thrombosis
Haddawy et al.
Med Decis Making 1996;16:315-325.
ABSTRACT  

Decision-theoretic Refinement Planning
Hillner
Med Decis Making 1996;16:419-420.
 

Antithrombotic Strategy After Total Hip Replacement: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis Comparing Prolonged Oral Anticoagulants With Screening for Deep Vein Thrombosis
Sarasin and Bounameaux
Arch Intern Med 1996;156:1661-1668.
ABSTRACT  

D-Dimer Testing and Acute Venous Thromboembolism: A Shortcut to Accurate Diagnosis?
Becker et al.
Arch Intern Med 1996;156:939-946.
ABSTRACT  

A Critical Pathway to Evaluate Suspected Deep Vein Thrombosis
Pearson et al.
Arch Intern Med 1995;155:1773-1778.
ABSTRACT  

Cost-effectiveness of Enoxaparin vs Low-Dose Warfarin in the Prevention of Deep-Vein Thrombosis After Total Hip Replacement Surgery
Menzin et al.
Arch Intern Med 1995;155:757-764.
ABSTRACT  

Management of Suspected Lower-Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis
Kahn and Haddawy
Arch Intern Med 1995;155:426-426.
ABSTRACT  

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Various Strategies in the Diagnostic Management of Pulmonary Embolism
Oudkerk et al.
Arch Intern Med 1993;153:947-954.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1992 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.