You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 152 No. 10, OCTOBER 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

A Comparison of Two-Dimensional Echocardiography vs Carotid Duplex Scanning in Older Patients With Cerebral Ischemia

Stephen J. Voyce, MD; Gerard P. Aurigemma, MD; Seth Dahlberg, MD; David Orsinelli, MD; Linda A. Pape, MD; Andrea Sweeney, RDCS; Paul Cardullo, RVT; Lawrence Recht, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1992;152(10):2089-2093.


Abstract

Background.—
To determine the relative value of two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography vs carotid duplex scanning and to devise an optimal, cost-effective diagnostic approach for older patients with cerebral ischemia, 68 consecutive patients in sinus rhythm who suffered focal cerebral ischemia were studied. All patients underwent 2D echocardiography and carotid duplex scanning in addition to routine clinical evaluation.

Methods.—
Twenty-five of 68 patients had Q-wave myocardial infarction by electrocardiography; nine (36%) of these 25 had left ventricular mural thrombi demonstrated by 2D echocardiography. In contrast, none of 43 patients without Q-wave myocardial infarction had clinically unsuspected findings diagnosed by 2D echocardiography. Duplex scanning, however, identified significant, abnormal findings in the carotid artery ipsilateral to the involved cerebral hemisphere in 23 patients (34%).

Conclusions.—
Thus, in older patients in sinus rhythm who suffer a cerebral ischemic event, carotid duplex scanning has a higher diagnostic yield than 2D echocardiography and appears to be a more cost-effective initial test. Our data suggest that in patients with carotid distribution cerebral ischemic events and no obvious cardiac source for emboli by history and physical examination, 2D echocardiography should be limited to those with evidence of Q-wave myocardial infarction by electrocardiography; such management should optimize diagnostic yield and cost effectiveness.

(Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:2089-2093)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Medicine, Division of Cardiology (Drs Voyce, Aurigemma, Dahlberg, Orsinelli, Pape, and Ms Sweeney and Mr Cardullo), and Neurology (Dr Recht), University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication March 2, 1992.

Presented, in part, at the subspecialty sessions of the American Federation for Clinical Research, Seattle, Wash, May 4, 1991.

Reprint requests to Division of Cardiology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, 55 Lake Ave N, Worcester, MA 01655 (Dr Aurigemma).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Cost-Effectiveness of Echocardiography to Identify Intracardiac Thrombus among Patients with First Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack
Meenan et al.
Med Decis Making 2007;27:161-177.
ABSTRACT  

Preventive health care, 1999 update: 2. Echocardiography for the detection of a cardiac source of embolus in patients with stroke
Kapral and Silver
CMAJ 1999;161:989-996.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY AND CAROTID IMAGING AFTER STROKE OR TIA
JWatch General 1992;1992:7-7.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1992 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.