This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (106)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Lawrence J. Schneiderman, MD; Robert A. Pearlman, MD, MPH; Robert M. Kaplan, PhD; John P. Anderson, PhD; Esther M. Rosenberg

Arch Intern Med. 1992;152(10):2114-2122.

Abstract
Objective.—
To determine whether brief general instructions in a typical proxy-instruction advance directive (California Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care [DPAHC]) provide interpretable information about patient requests to limit life-saving treatments, and to determine whether patient treatment preferences are stable over time.

Design.—
Prospective structured interviews.

Setting.—
University of California, San Diego Medical Center and Veterans Affairs Medical Center, La Jolla.

Patients.—
One hundred four patients (from a randomly chosen sample of 185) with a 5-year life expectancy of no better than 50% as judged by their physicians.

Main Outcome Measures.—
Patients completed the California DPAHC, a proxy-instruction advance directive, at entry and at 1 year. The patients also completed a questionnaire at entry, after 6 months, and after 1 year, indicating their preferences on a five-point Likert-format comparative rating scale for cardiopulmonary resuscitation, mechanical ventilation, artificial nutrition, and hospitalization for pneumonia.

Results.—
Sixty-eight percent of the subjects executed the DPAHC. Most patients wished treatments to be limited or withheld under certain conditions of reduced quality of life. Although general instructions noted on the DPAHC and preferences regarding specific procedures were stable over the course of a year, the advance directive's general instructions were often inconsistent with, and poor predictors of, specific procedure preferences.

Conclusions.—
The brief general instruction component of the California DPAHC is not helpful in communicating patient wishes regarding specific life-saving procedures.

(Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:2114-2122)

Author Affiliations
From the Division of Health Care Sciences, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla (Drs Schneiderman, Kaplan, and Anderson and Ms Rosenberg); and Seattle Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Division of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle (Dr Pearlman).

Footnotes
Accepted for publication February 21, 1992.

Reprint requests to Community and Family Medicine and Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0622 (Dr Schneiderman).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Affective Forecasting and Advance Care Planning: Anticipating Quality of Life in Future Health Statuses
Winter et al.
J Health Psychol 2009;14:447-456.
ABSTRACT  

End-of-life preferences in elderly patients admitted for heart failure
Formiga et al.
QJM 2004;97:803-808.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Resuscitating Advance Directives
Lo and Steinbrook
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:1501-1506.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reforming Care for Persons Near the End of Life: The Promise of Quality Improvement
Lynn et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2002;137:117-122.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Predicting Elderly Outpatients' Life-Sustaining Treatment Preferences over Time: The Majority Rules
Houts et al.
Med Decis Making 2002;22:39-52.
ABSTRACT  

Valuation of Life: A Concept and a Scale
Lawton et al.
J Aging Health 2001;13:3-31.
ABSTRACT  

Plan ahead: How neurologists can enhance patient-centered medicine
Bernat
Neurology 2001;56:144-145.
FULL TEXT  

The Attitudes of Patients With Advanced AIDS Toward Use of the Medical Futility Rationale in Decisions to Forgo Mechanical Ventilation
Curtis et al.
Arch Intern Med 2000;160:1597-1601.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Advance Directives for Mental Health Treatment
Srebnik and Fond
Psychiatr. Serv. 1999;50:919-925.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Practice Parameter: The Care of the Patient with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (An Evidence-Based Review): Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology
Miller et al.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 1999;13:93-107.
 

Practice parameter: The care of the patient with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (an evidence-based review): Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology
Miller et al.
Neurology 1999;52:1311-1311.
FULL TEXT  

Elderly Patients' Preferences for Long-term Life Support
Murphy and Santilli
Arch Fam Med 1998;7:484-488.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Multi-institutional Study of Care Given to Patients Dying in Hospitals: Ethical and Practice Implications
Faber-Langendoen
Arch Intern Med 1996;156:2130-2136.
ABSTRACT  

Involvement of Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Programs in Advance Directive Education
Heffner and Barbieri
Arch Intern Med 1996;156:1746-1751.
ABSTRACT  

Factors Associated With Change in Resuscitation Preference of Seriously Ill Patients
Rosenfeld et al.
Arch Intern Med 1996;156:1558-1564.
ABSTRACT  

Advance End-of-Life Treatment Planning
Miles et al.
Arch Intern Med 1996;156:1062-1068.
ABSTRACT  

Who Decides? Physicians' Willingness to Use Life-Sustaining Treatment
Hanson et al.
Arch Intern Med 1996;156:785-789.
ABSTRACT  

Promoting Inpatient Directives About Life-Sustaining Treatments in a Community Hospital: Results of a 3-Year Time-Series Intervention Trial
Reilly et al.
Arch Intern Med 1995;155:2317-2323.
ABSTRACT  

Promoting Completion of Health Care Proxies Following Hospitalization: A Randomized Controlled Trial in a Community Hospital
Reilly et al.
Arch Intern Med 1995;155:2202-2206.
ABSTRACT  

Knowledge and Experience With Alzheimer's Disease: Relationship to Resuscitation Preference
Griffith et al.
Arch Fam Med 1995;4:780-784.
ABSTRACT  

Terminal Care of the Very Old: Changes in the Way We Die
Hesse
Arch Intern Med 1995;155:1513-1518.
ABSTRACT  

Making an advance directive
Robertson
BMJ 1995;310:236-238.
FULL TEXT  

Living Wills and Resuscitation Preferences in an Elderly Population
Walker et al.
Arch Intern Med 1995;155:171-175.
ABSTRACT  

Changes in Decisions by Elderly Persons Based on Treatment Description
Ainslie and Beisecker
Arch Intern Med 1994;154:2225-2233.
ABSTRACT  

Relationship of Advance Directives to Physician-Patient Communication
Virmani et al.
Arch Intern Med 1994;154:909-913.
ABSTRACT  

The Influence of the Probability of Survival on Patients' Preferences Regarding Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Murphy et al.
NEJM 1994;330:545-549.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Advance Directives: Stability of Patients' Treatment Choices
Emanuel et al.
Arch Intern Med 1994;154:209-217.
ABSTRACT  

Increasing the Completion of the Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Rubin et al.
JAMA 1994;271:209-212.
ABSTRACT  

Ceasing Futile Resuscitation in the Field: Ethical Considerations
Jecker and Schneiderman
Arch Intern Med 1992;152:2392-2397.
ABSTRACT