You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 152 No. 11, NOVEMBER 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Physicians' Attitudes Toward Mandatory Workplace Urine Drug Testing

Stephen J. Lemon, MD, MPH; Dean G. Sienko, MD, MS; Patrick C. Alguire, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1992;152(11):2238-2242.


Abstract

Background.—
Workplace drug testing programs are being increasingly implemented in both the public and private sectors, and health care workers are unlikely to be excluded from such testing.

Methods.—
A survey of attending physicians' attitudes toward mandatory hospital-based urine drug testing was undertaken in a medium-sized, midwestern county.

Results.—
Seventy-four percent (272/368) of the sample responded. Seventy-two percent of the subjects believed physician drug use to be a minor or nonexistent problem, 38% lacked confidence in the testing procedure, and 60% believed that testing infringed on the physician's right to privacy; yet 87% would submit to testing if required by a hospital. Forty-five percent of respondents agreed with the policy of mandatory testing for physicians with hospital privileges, 34% disagreed, and 21% were uncertain. Respondents were more supportive of mandatory testing of other health care and non—health care occupations than for themselves. Support for testing was greatest for illicit drugs. If implemented, physicians preferred mandatory testing to be performed by hospital medical staff independent of hospital administration.

Conclusions.—
Further education and discussion within the physician community appears to be necessary before widespread mandatory workplace urine drug testing of physicians is implemented.

(Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:2238-2242)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, (Drs Lemon and Alguire), and the Ingham County Health Department, Lansing, Mich (Dr Sienko). Dr Lemon is now a Cancer Prevention Fellow with the Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Md.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication April 21, 1992.

Presented in part at the meeting of the Michigan Chapter of the American College of Physicians Associates, Grand Rapids, Mich, May 10, 1991.

Reprint requests to the Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Cancer Institute, Executive Plaza South, T-41, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Dr Lemon).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1992 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.