You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 152 No. 2, FEBRUARY 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (14)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Cardiovascular Responses to Phlebotomy and Sitting in Middle-aged and Elderly Subjects

George A. Kuchel, MD; Jerry Avorn, MD; May J. Reed, MD; David Fields, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1992;152(2):366-370.


Abstract

Background.—
Responding appropriately to hypotensive challenges is an important determinant of health and functional independence in elderly individuals. Cardiovascular responses to phlebotomy and postural change were evaluated using a large database developed in a study designed to establish the safety of blood donation by older individuals.

Methods.—
The groups studied included 464 subjects aged 65 years and younger (range, 52 to 65 years) and 532 subjects more than 65 years old (range, 66 to 78 years old). Blood pressure and pulse rate measurements were followed by the withdrawal of 500 mL of blood. These measurements were repeated, first in the supine and then in the sitting position.

Results.—
Nearly all individuals studied remained hemodynamically stable after these two challenges. Age was not an independent predictor of blood pressure change after either phlebotomy or postural change. Large decreases in diastolic blood pressure were equally rare in both age groups. However, more older subjects (15.2%) exhibited a decline of 20 mm Hg or more in systolic blood pressure following phlebotomy, compared with the middle-aged group (6.9%). These age-related differences did not persist after controlling for the higher initial systolic blood pressures observed in the older subjects. Postphlebotomy postural change to the sitting position had little additional effect.

Conclusions.—
These results indicate that the ability to respond to hypovolemia and postural change remains relatively intact in healthy elderly individuals. The higher prevalence of a significant drop in systolic blood pressure after phlebotomy, orthostasis, and possibly other homeostatic challenges in older subjects is probably due to the presence of higher basal blood pressure readings, including hypertension. In spite of these differences, blood donation is appropriate and should be encouraged in healthy elderly individuals in this age group.

(Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:366-370)



Author Affiliations

From the Division on Aging, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (Drs Kuchel, Avorn, and Fields); Gerontology Division, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel and Brigham and Women's Hospitals, Boston, Mass (Drs Kuchel, Avorn, and Fields), and Program for the Analysis of Clinical Strategies, Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Hospital, Boston, Mass (Drs Avorn, Reed, and Fields). Dr Kuchel is now with the Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication September 9, 1991.

Reprint requests to the Program for the Analysis of Clinical Strategies, Geriatrics Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115 (Dr Avorn).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Orthostatic hypotension: framework of the syndrome
Naschitz and Rosner
Postgrad. Med. J. 2007;83:568-574.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1992 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.