 |
|
Decisions for and Against Resuscitation in an Acute Geriatric Medicine Unit Serving the Frail Elderly
Lucia V. Torian, PhD;
Emily J. Davidson, RPA-C;
Howard M. Fillit, MD;
George Fulop, MD;
Laura L. Sell, MSN
Arch Intern Med. 1992;152(3):561-565.
Abstract
| |
Recent studies indicate continuing controversy over the appropriateness of intensive care in various clinical settings, particularly for very young and very old patients. We studied decisions regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and the associated clinical course in an acute geriatric unit serving the frail elderly. Despite multiple acute and chronic conditions, advanced age, and functional impairment, patients overwhelmingly preferred CPR. The patients with donot-resuscitate (DNR) orders were more functionally dependent, more acutely and chronically ill, and less likely to participate in the decision regarding CPR. The majority of DNR orders were made by surrogates, while the majority of CPR directives were made by the patients themselves. Other forms of acute and supportive care, such as parenteral antibiotics, artificial feeding, and transfusions were not withheld from the DNR patients unless a separate decision to limit a specific treatment was undertaken following consultation between the attending physician and the patient or family. Acuity of illness greater than two SDs above the unit mean and the presence of a surrogate decision maker predicted the majority of DNR orders. Length of stay averaged 28 days for all unit patients, 24 days for patients choosing CPR, and 46 days for patients with DNR orders. The four patients who were resuscitated but died stayed an average of 25 days, while the two survivors of resuscitation stayed 20 and 53 days, respectively. The findings indicate that patients and their families considered appropriate clinical criteria including severity of illness when making their decisions about CPR. Nevertheless, the majority chose to be resuscitated in the event of an arrest. Further studies are needed to explore medical decision making by elderly inpatients and their surrogates and to describe the associated clinical course.
(Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:561-565)
Author Affiliations
From the Ritter Department of Geriatrics and Adult Development (Drs Torian, Davidson, Fillit, and Fulop); Departments of Psychiatry (Dr Fulop) and Nursing (Ms Sell), Mount Sinai Medical Center; and Brookdale Center on Aging, Hunter College, The City University of New York (Dr Torian), New York, NY.
Footnotes
Accepted for publication October 14, 1991.
Presented in part at the 43rd meeting of Gerontological Society of America, Boston, Mass, November 19, 1990.
Reprints not available.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Content of Advance Directives for Individuals With Advanced Dementia
Triplett et al.
J Aging Health 2008;20:583-596.
ABSTRACT
Improving End-of-Life Care for Older Adults: An International Challenge
Ritchie and Wieland
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 2007;62:393-394.
FULL TEXT
Prevalence of Patients With Do-Not-Resuscitate Status on Acute Geriatric Wards in Flanders, Belgium
De Gendt et al.
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 2007;62:395-400.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Determining resuscitation preferences of elderly inpatients: a review of the literature
Frank et al.
CMAJ 2003;169:795-799.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Variation in the Use of Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders in Patients With Stroke
Shepardson et al.
Arch Intern Med 1997;157:1841-1847.
ABSTRACT
Acute Care Costs of the Oldest Old: They Cost Less, Their Care Intensity Is Less, and They Go to Nonteaching Hospitals
Perls and Wood
Arch Intern Med 1996;156:754-760.
ABSTRACT
Changes in Decisions by Elderly Persons Based on Treatment Description
Ainslie and Beisecker
Arch Intern Med 1994;154:2225-2233.
ABSTRACT
The Influence of the Probability of Survival on Patients' Preferences Regarding Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Murphy et al.
NEJM 1994;330:545-549.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|
