You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 152 No. 4, APRIL 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (35)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Esophageal Perforation

A Reassessment of the Criteria for Choosing Medical or Surgical Therapy

Hubert A. Shaffer, Jr, MD; Gregg Valenzuela, MD; Ravinder K. Mittal, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1992;152(4):757-761.


Abstract

Treatment for esophageal perforation has traditionally been surgery, but development of more effective antibiotics and parenteral nutrition has led to a cautious trend toward nonoperative management. The goal of this investigation was to identify relevant presenting features that would guide a physician in making the therapeutic choice between medical and surgical therapy. Twenty-five consecutive patients with esophageal perforation—20 iatrogenic and five spontaneous—were reviewed. Treatment was medical in 12 cases and surgical in 13. The findings indicate that many patients with esophageal perforation can be treated medically. The following guidelines are suggested for selecting nonoperative treatment: (1) clinically stable patients; (2) instrumental perforations detected before major mediastinal contamination has occurred or perforations with such a long delay in diagnosis that the patient has already demonstrated tolerance for the perforation without the need for surgery; and (3) esophageal disruptions well contained within the mediastinum or a pleural loculus.

(Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:757-761)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Radiology (Dr Shaffer) and the Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine (Drs Valenzuela and Mittal), University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville. Dr Valenzuela is now in private practice in Richmond, Va.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication August 27, 1991.

Reprint requests to Box 170, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, VA 22908 (Dr Shaffer).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Evolving options in the management of esophageal perforation
Brinster et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2004;77:1475-1483.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Esophageal Perforation: A Reassessment of the Criteria for Choosing Medical or Surgical Therapy
Trastek
Arch Intern Med 1992;152:693-693.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1992 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.