You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 152 No. 4, APRIL 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (19)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Improvement in 'Stat' Laboratory Turnaround Time

A Model Continuous Quality Improvement Project

Edward I. Bluth, MD; Douglas J. Lambert, MBA; Thomas P. Lohmann, MD; David N. Franklin; Meg Bourgeois, RN; Carl G. Kardinal, MD; Joseph R. Dalovisio, MD; Melva M. Williams, MT(ASCP); Arlene S. Becker, RN

Arch Intern Med. 1992;152(4):837-840.


Abstract

Background.—
Continuous quality improvement is being advocated as the process that, if adopted, would improve the efficiency, productiveness, and quality of medical institutions, thereby helping to solve the health care crisis our country is facing. To determine if these techniques could be effective in a tertiary-care multispecialty group practice, a model project was undertaken. The model project chosen was to determine if we could improve the turnaround time for "stat" laboratory examinations performed in our large outpatient facility.

Methods.—
A 10-member team consisting of everyone involved in the process of laboratory testing was empowered to evaluate the present process and make appropriate changes. With traditional techniques of quality improvement, the process was assessed, data were collected and statistically analyzed, changes were introduced, and data were recollected and analyzed.

Results.—
After intervention, the preanalytic delays were reduced by 76% and the postanalytic delays by 88%. Waiting time for patients was reduced by an average of 62%. By instituting the changes suggested, the institution saved $225 000 on a one-time basis and $40 000 to $50 000 on a recurring basis.

Conclusion.—
Adoption of quality improvement techniques appears to be a desirable management paradigm that should be explored by all medical institutions interested in maximizing the quality of care offered while at the same time minimizing its cost.

(Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:837-840)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Radiology (Dr Bluth), Ophthalmology (Mr Lambert), Pathology (Dr Lohmann and Ms Williams), Human Resources (Mr Franklin), Medicine (Ms Bourgeois and Drs Kardinal and Dalovisio), and Quality Assurance (Ms Becker), Ochsner Clinic and Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation, New Orleans, La.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication September 20, 1991.

Reprint requests to Ochsner Clinic, 1514 Jefferson Hwy, New Orleans, LA 70121 (Dr Bluth).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Laboratory Medicine Quality Indicators: A Review of the Literature
Shahangian and Snyder
Am J Clin Pathol 2009;131:418-431.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1992 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.