You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 152 No. 7, July 1, 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

The Lipid Research Clinics Coronary Primary Prevention Trial. Results of 6 years of post-trial follow-up. The Lipid Research Clinics Investigators


BACKGROUND--Participants in the Lipid Research Clinics Coronary Primary Prevention Trial, a randomized, cholesterol-lowering trial comparing cholestyramine (N = 1907) vs placebo (N = 1899) treatment in 35- and 59-year-old asymptomatic hypercholesterolemic men, conducted between 1973 and 1983, were followed up annually from 1985 until 1989. Post-trial treatment was not provided. METHODS--Eleven predefined hypotheses pertaining to possible benefits and adverse effects of in-trial cholestyramine treatment were tested by standard statistical comparisons of the two original Coronary Primary Prevention Trial treatment groups (cholestyramine and placebo). RESULTS--Similar increasing proportions of cholestyramine and placebo used cholesterol-lowering drugs post-trial. After 13.4 years of in-trial plus post-trial follow-up, there were 13 (143 vs 156) fewer deaths in the cholestyramine group than in the placebo group. Although not statistically significant, the mortality hazard ratio (0.89) was similar to that in other cholesterol-lowering trials. This trend, a result of reduced coronary heart disease mortality, occurred despite a post-trial narrowing of the in-trial cholestyramine-placebo difference in coronary heart disease incidence from 32 (155 vs 187) to 16 (268 vs 284). The cholestyramine and placebo groups had similar 13.4-year mortality rates from cancer, other medical causes, and trauma and similar cancer incidence rates. However, 13.4-year incidences of benign colorectal tumors (50 vs 34), cancer of the buccal cavity and pharynx (eight vs two), gallbladder disease (68 vs 53), and gallbladder surgery (58 vs 40) were nonsignificantly increased in the cholestyramine group. CONCLUSION--Overall, 6 years of post-Coronary Primary Prevention Trial follow-up have not provided conclusive evidence of benefit or long-term toxicity of cholestyramine treatment beyond that evident at the cessation of the trial.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Donald Sharp Fredrickson, MD: 1924-2002
Gotto
Circulation 2003;107:1714-1716.
FULL TEXT  

Donald S. Fredrickson, MD: 1924-2002
Gotto
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio. 2002;22:1506-1508.
FULL TEXT  

3-Hydroxy-3-Methylglutaryl Coenzyme A Reductase Inhibitors and the Risk of Cancer: A Nested Case-Control Study
Blais et al.
Arch Intern Med 2000;160:2363-2368.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effective Lipid Modification by Partial Ileal Bypass Reduced Long-term Coronary Heart Disease Mortality and Morbidity: Five-Year Posttrial Follow-up Report From the POSCH
Buchwald et al.
Arch Intern Med 1998;158:1253-1261.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The number needed to treat: a clinically useful nomogram in its proper context
Chatellier et al.
BMJ 1996;312:426-429.
FULL TEXT  

Assessing possible hazards of reducing serum cholesterol
Law et al.
BMJ 1994;308:373-379.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1992 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.