You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 152 No. 7, JULY 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (12)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Assessing Symptom Improvement After Elective Prostatectomy for Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy

Ann Barry Flood, PhD; Nicholas A. Black, MD; Klim McPherson, PhD; Joseph Smith, FRCS; Grant Williams, FRCS

Arch Intern Med. 1992;152(7):1507-1512.


Abstract



Background. —
Elective surgery for benign prostatic hypertrophy requires estimates of likely improvement.

Methods. —
Data are from a prospective study of all patients without cancer who underwent transurethral prostatectomy. After eliminating patients for whom surgery was not elective, we examined symptom improvement.

Results.—
Surgery was effective in reducing symptoms for all but those with very mild preoperative symptoms. For the remainder, the average level of postoperative outcomes achieved was independent of the initial symptom severity.

Conclusions.—
Elective prostatectomy is effectiveness for improving symptoms. The improvement is typically sustained, and for some symptoms improvement continues during the first year after surgery. Patients with severe symptoms were as likely to achieve the same level of postoperative improvement as were patients with less severe problems initially. However, patients with very mild symptoms benefited little or none from surgery.

(Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:1507-1512)



Author Affiliations



From the Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH (Dr Flood); London (England) School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (Drs Black and McPherson); Department of Urology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, England (Dr Smith); and Nephro-Urology Unit, Harley Street Clinic, London (Dr Williams).


Footnotes



Accepted for publication January 24, 1992.

Reprint requests to Center for Evaluative Clinical Sciences, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH 03756 (Dr Flood).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Guidelines, enthusiasms, uncertainty, and the limits to purchasing
McKee and Clarke
BMJ 1995;310:101-104.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1992 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.