This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on Web of Science (20)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Treating and Rating Disability in a Pain Clinic

Mark D. Sullivan, MD, PhD; John D. Loeser, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1992;152(9):1829-1835.

Abstract
Medical diagnosis sanctions illness and directs physicians toward effective treatment. In chronic illness, these two functions of diagnosis can come into conflict. Nowhere is this conflict more striking than in the case of disability ratings for those with chronic pain. An institutional case study examining the relation between a pain clinic and a worker's compensation program is presented and analyzed in terms of two questions: (1) Is it ethical for one physician to both treat pain and rate disability in patients with chronic pain? (2) Is physician rating of disability due to pain scientifically valid? Ethical and conceptual analyses support a negative response to each of these questions. The roots of the ethical and scientific problems concerning disability ratings are identified in society's demand to differentiate medical and nonmedical distress. We propose a system of time-limited compensation for pain as a therapeutically superior alternative to disability ratings.

(Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:1829-1835)

Author Affiliations
From the Multidisciplinary Pain Center (Drs Sullivan and Loeser) and the Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (Dr Sullivan) and Neurological Surgery and Anesthesiology (Dr Loeser), University of Washington, Seattle.

Footnotes
Accepted for publication February 21, 1992.

Reprint requests to Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, RP-10, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 (Dr Sullivan).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?