You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 152 No. 9, SEPTEMBER 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (4)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Half a Loaf Is Better Than Waiting for the Bread Truck

A Computerized Mini-Medical Record for Outpatient Care

Timothy S. Carey, MD, MPH; Diane Thomas; Andree Woolsey; Rita Proctor, MS; Miles Philbeck, MS; Gerald Bowen; Christi Blish; Suzanne Fletcher, MD, MSc

Arch Intern Med. 1992;152(9):1845-1849.


Abstract

We describe a locally developed system for partial computer storage of medical data, called the mini-medical record system. The system produces a typed face sheet prior to each patient visit. The face sheet, which also serves as a progress note, contains patient demographic data, medical problem lists, previous vital signs, allergies, medication profile, and health maintenance reminders. Between regularly scheduled visits, all computerized data are available by computer printout for unscheduled visits to walk-in clinics and the emergency department. Structured reports are generated by the system that describes each resident and faculty members' practice. Quality assurance reports are also available. Since the system draws from several already existing databases, new data entry requirements are modest and cost to the institution is low. Partially computerized systems can be developed inexpensively and are well received in multispecialty practices, where interphysician communication is vital.

(Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:1845-1849)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and the Information Services Division and Department of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication March 23, 1992.

Reprint requests to the Division of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Division of General Medicine, CB 7110-5039 OldClinic Bldg, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7110(Dr Carey).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1992 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.